Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark; ExGeeEye; EveningStar
Number 1, I don't owe you or anyone else a reply. Nobody here does.

Number 2, I form my own opinions (imagine that). I don't need anyone from the left or the right telling me what to think or validating my conclusions.

My point was that the use of the phrase was stupid because it would, predictably, allow the left to re-frame the discussion around those two words and ignore the rest of her three page statement.

The very fact that Dershowitz is "defending" palin's use of blood libel just proves my point.

47 posted on 01/12/2011 3:25:25 PM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911
The very fact that Dershowitz is "defending" palin's use of blood libel just proves my point.

*Ponders the utter stupidity of that statement*

You know, virtually every conservative commentator has come not only to her defense, but strongly so, and with well reasoned points. Krauthammer, the guys from Powerline, Glenn Reynolds (libertarian), Michelle Malkin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, there is virtually no one on the conservative side that is not ridiculing the MSM or defending her for her use of the words "blood libel".

Even libs such as Jonathan Chait are defending the use.

Go suck some lemons somewhere else please, you don't "think for yourself", your PDS is just driving you insane.

It must not be fun to be such a jerk.

50 posted on 01/12/2011 3:36:27 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson