Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HamiltonJay

Ding, Ding, you nailed the bigger problem. This is what most people not familiar with the ins and outs of the defense industry don’t understand. Having worked in the industry myself, I don’t know of a single contract or program that ever came in on the date and budget originally agreed to in the original contract proposal. The military, of which I am a huge supporter, is notorious for constantly changing specs, expectations, systems, and timelines due to the constantly changing nature of the battlefield, which in turn changes their needs and requirements. This is especially visible in ‘long-term R&D contracts’ (ie. projects slatted to take 5+ years to develop). By the time the producer closes in on the completion date, the entire scope of the system could have changed.


35 posted on 01/13/2011 1:34:11 PM PST by LoneStarGI (Vegetarian: Old Indian word for "BAD HUNTER.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: LoneStarGI

Exactly.

Presidential Helicopter program anyone? The Navy killed that because they just couldn’t leave it alone.

Withheld some and added new requirements after initial designs were completed. Required intensive amounts of re-design work which costs a lot of money.

Added more and more capability requirements until the thing was just too damn heavy to fly anymore and was subsequently cancelled.

Sometimes, if not most of the time, the Pentagon is their own worst enemy.


37 posted on 01/13/2011 1:50:59 PM PST by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson