Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miss_Meyet

Peter King is an embarrassment. He needs to go. By “needs to go”, I am referring to the voters in his district picking someone else in their next primary election.

I don’t mean to insinuate anything violent as I know the feds have right-wingers on the Internet in their crosshairs and have us targeted for bad-scary-speech that makes mother Pelosi cry.


13 posted on 01/14/2011 8:04:01 AM PST by MichiganConservative (Terrorists don't commit genocide. That's what governments do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: MichiganConservative
Peter King is an embarrassment. He needs to go.
By “needs to go”, I am referring to the voters in his district picking someone else in their next primary election.

Wow! In light of everything that's happened lately, I'm really, really glad you clarified that. I thought that you meant he needed to visit the men's room...

19 posted on 01/14/2011 8:09:50 AM PST by Miss_Meyet (..an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.Quote fromSomeone famous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MichiganConservative

Imagine if our “revolutionary” forefathers like Thomas Paine had never been allowed allowed to say; (Give me Liberty, or give me death!) but of course the MSM geniuses would define this slogan as a declaration of committing suicide. But should be deeply investigated and evaluated any way.


20 posted on 01/14/2011 8:10:20 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP ( Give me Liberty, or give me an M-24A2! (Cause I'm a nutcase....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MichiganConservative
>>>By “needs to go”, I am referring to the voters in his district picking someone else in their next primary election.<<<

As I'm sure you know, a common term used for encouraging voters to pick someone else in a primary is “targeting”. Since you have essentially called for “targeting” Rep. King, you have used violent, “vitriolic” and “uncivil” language that could lead (practically compel, actually) some unbalanced person to try to kill him (Unless that 1,000 foot law can be quickly passed, as we know homicidal lunatics have the utmost respect such boundaries). Shame on you! /sarc

38 posted on 01/14/2011 8:38:47 AM PST by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson