Sorry, I don't take kindly to cowardly libel.
-Reince was in graduate school when he worked for the NAACP, not college.
And you accuse me of hand wringing! May I ask from which college you received your Master's Degree in Advanced Semantics?
It was about ten years ago.
So how many decades does one have to avoid internships with liberal non-profit organizations to pass your RINO purity test?
-Since when is a “fair price” justification for forcing someone off their land?
The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the constitution became applicable to the states with the ratification of the 14th amendment in 1868. You better catch up on reading your newspaper pile, Gramps, you are more than a century out of date!
-If everyone is underhanded, it’s okay to be underhanded, too. Great rationale.
Once the bill is passed, everyone has a reason to get a representative share of the taxes they put into it. Be sure to think about your hypocrisy the next time you take a tax deduction or drive on a public road.
Did you miss the part where he was working for the guys who were against the stimulus at the same time he was paid by companies lobbying for it?
I'd wager that you are against Social Security and Medicare, but you will cash their checks all the same.
-Are you reeeeeeally trying to say that Priebus was solely responsible for driving the TEA party in WI? Strictly speaking,
No, you are deceitfully misquoting me. The WISGOP, under Reince's leadership, organized and paid for the better part of the Madison TEA Party rally.
it is a true grassroots organization: at the same time there was one raly [sic] in Madison, there were six ir seven other ones going on.
Which are you referring to? Here in Wisconsin, the state GOP still paid for several of the big ones but maintained a lower profile after the first one in Madison.
The groundswell of the movement carried the elections, not the efforts of one person.
Sure, but Reince arguably did more than any other individual here in Wisconsin to win those elections.
Of course, if you have evidence that Priebus was able to solely motivate an entire organization which is by nature leaderless, please be my guest.
I never said he did, but he did sign the biggest checks.
My point is that while he is better than Steele, he isn’t exactly the sort of bedrock conservative we should be looking for.
Based upon the libel and poor logic you have demonstrated here, you aren't a representative of bedrock conservatism.
If you knew anything about the namesake of your screen name, you might begin to comprehend that.
I have no doubt that even Ronald Reagan wouldn't be pure enough for you holier-than-thou sour pusses!
You need to get ahold of yourself, and pick up a dictionary. “Libel” is a false statement, solely for the purpose of defamation; “logic” is the creation of an inference, based upon the criteria of validity and demonstration. You may want to also look up the definition of “system building”. Everything I have stated has been easily-researched FACT. Your hysterical disagreement does not alter these facts, except perhaps in your mind.
These facts were used by me to infer that we may need to keep an eye on the newly elected RNC Chair, because his past choices are not neccessarily conservative. Again, you may disagree with my conclusion, but that does not alter the facts.
As for the rest of your babbling, you are so far off the mark that you should probably go back and read my definition of logical inference. How exactly does my being against corrupt lawyering make me against Social Security? “Gramps”? Cash SSI checks? You will probably not be able to put this together on your own, so I’ll help you: you’re an idiot for casting aspersions to my age as I have given you nothing from which to infer that. I’m 40.
If you claim the mantle of TEA party representative, you had better be prepared to back it up. The absolute last thing we need is another chameleon who changes his color according to which way the political wind is blowing, and Priebus is skating right up to the edge of that definition based upon his past political leanings. Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it, a’la George Bush and Scott Brown. Is Priebus better than Steele? Probably, but only time will tell.
As for my representation of conservatism, take a look at my posting history, dumbass, and think before you open your mouth: your misunderstanding of the words “logic”, “semantics”, and “libel” alone disqualify you from further discourse.