Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Obama Has Said about His Own Birth
The American Thinker ^ | January 17, 2011 | Jack Cashill,

Posted on 01/17/2011 2:50:06 AM PST by Scanian

While Republican Congressman Frank Pallone read the "natural born Citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution on the House floor last Thursday, a spirited female in the audience shouted out, "Except Obama! Except Obama! Help us, Jesus!"

Later that day, NBC's Brian Williams improbably chose to assign blame for the woman's outburst on newly elected House speaker John Boehner. "How much responsibility do you feel?" Williams asked pointedly.

"The state of Hawaii has said Obama was born there," said Boehner, who is no more intimate with the "Birther" movement than Williams himself. "That was good enough for me."

The person Williams should have been asking about "responsibility" is the president. Obama's conspicuous fabrications over the years have caused even the sober among us to doubt his origins story.

In September 2009, President Obama addressed the nation's schoolchildren writ large, an innovation that struck many on the right as a wee bit too Big-Brotherly. In the talk, Obama asked America's students to take personal responsibility. That was all well enough.

Missed in the media hubbub, however, was his take on why this could be difficult for some students. "I get it," he told the kiddies. "I know what that's like. My father left my family when I was two years old, and I was raised by a single mother."

In his 1995 memoir Dreams from My Father, Obama made the same claim. "He had left Hawaii back in 1963," he wrote of Obama Sr., "when I was only two years old."

When Obama wrote this in Dreams, he may have been relating what he had himself been told. By 2009, he knew better, but so vested was he in the story, and so useful had it been in his rise, that he continued to dissemble, even before millions of schoolchildren

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; constitution; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamasr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 01/17/2011 2:50:11 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Obama will continue to be defended simply because he is black. It is part of the culture, the liberals have forced us to accept it. We all know he is false, but that doesn’t matter.

The rule of law is over in this country.


2 posted on 01/17/2011 3:03:31 AM PST by vanilla swirl (We are the Patrick Henry we have been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I’m sure conservative talking media aka Rush, Sean, Levin, Beck, Laura etc will all be picking up on this breaking news story this week. Rotflmao- yea right, our talking bobbleheads are turning in to total main stream media republican party mouthpieces.


3 posted on 01/17/2011 3:11:25 AM PST by stockpirate (Sen. Mitch McConnel (R) has betrayed the Nov. 2, 2010 voters w/his tax bill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Born in Hawaii with 3 Soc. Sec. numbers, one from Conn. Yep, I got it. To bad the SCOTUS don’t got it.


4 posted on 01/17/2011 4:22:42 AM PST by Waco (From Seward to Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

If he runs again, I believe there are several states who will require proof of citizenship to be on their ballot. Arizona is one.


5 posted on 01/17/2011 4:25:33 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

To me, the article only raises 2 points....that his mother & Obama sr. were never married & that she didn’t list him as the father on the birth certificate. It really doesn’t give much of an argument for him not being born in either Hawaii or WA.


6 posted on 01/17/2011 4:31:39 AM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl
Obama will continue to be defended simply because he is black.

That should read, "Obama will continue to be defended simply because he is a liberal black." Don't expect the same kind of hands-off treatment for Herman Cain.

7 posted on 01/17/2011 4:35:22 AM PST by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
"Above the Law" has applied to Obama, OJ Simpson, Sharpton, Charles Rangel, Maxine Waters, Algore, Clinton, Frank and Dodd. They are above the law the same way the mafia in Sicily is.

These folks laugh at the law, the constitution, and us.

8 posted on 01/17/2011 4:42:29 AM PST by Huebolt (It's not over until there is not ONE DEMOCRAT HOLDING OFFICE ANYWHERE. Not even a dog catcher!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl

How many of us feel our nation is living a lie because we cannot secure the facts about the past of our own President?
Any individual seeking that office should know that there can be no secrets in matters which require documentation of one’s life. In his case, we cannot even find out anything about his kindergarten records. For Heaven’s Sake, people, this is madness. If this is the biggest scam of our history, then we need to know. If it is not, we need to know that. Becoming a public official means that your private life is not private anymore and the people have a right to know who you are and where you come from. Along this line, I think it is incredible that Caroline Kennedy has been able to keep a Kennedy documentary off the air through threats of withholding some information from ABC. So, let her withhold it..It probably is just propaganda, anyway..Let the people decide. Freedom is precious and all of these things are robbing us of what is most significant to our survival.


9 posted on 01/17/2011 4:47:44 AM PST by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Liberals fail to question Obama’s conspicuous fabrications over the years.To hell with the law will roll over on them.


10 posted on 01/17/2011 4:51:00 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

The birth certificate issue is a diversion from the fact that this man is destroying our economy, our national security, and our standing in the rest of the world, who sees him as weak weak weak.


11 posted on 01/17/2011 5:21:50 AM PST by Carley (IDIOLOGY TRUMPS FACTS IN THE LEFT'S QUEST FOR POWER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Fundamentally here are the **FACTS**:

Fact: Not even **one** legislator, judge, military person, state attorney general, state election official, or electoral college member has seen any government certified ( court acceptable) evidence that Obama is a natural born citizen ( or even a citizen at all!)

Fact: The only evidence presented to legislators, judges, military personnel, state attorney generals, election officials, and electoral college voters has been twitters, Internet images of dubious origin, and a few carefully crafted and highly massaged ( masturbated) statements from Lingle and Fukino. ( Am I correct that Lingle’s statement would be considered “hearsay”?)

Fact: It is a **SIMPLE** matter to prove one’s natural born citizenship. Unanointed American serfs do it routinely for many reasons. Most of these reasons are far far far less important than having control of the world's most destructive military force since the dawn of creation.

Fact: Obama has gone to considerable expense to prevent the release of **COMMON** documents. He has sent private and TAX-PAID attorneys to courts across the nation.

Fact: The citizenship of the sweet little “tweenies” performing in their cute spandex costumes on the U.S. Olympic gymnastic team are better vetted than Obama.

Fact: A **REAL** American president would be **HONORED** to promptly prove that he is a natural born citizen. He would be especially pleased to do this for any member of the military.

12 posted on 01/17/2011 5:44:33 AM PST by wintertime (Re: Obama, Rush Limbaugh said, "He was born here." ( So? Where's the proof?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley
Diversion? NONSENSE!

If the Constitution had been upheld and defended from the beginning we would not have this likely usurper in a position to destroy the economy and national security.

13 posted on 01/17/2011 5:46:25 AM PST by wintertime (Re: Obama, Rush Limbaugh said, "He was born here." ( So? Where's the proof?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

We have to keep pushing for it. Arizona didn’t pass their law. Their squishy senate backed down, then the whole state came under assault for trying to defend their border with Mexico. I still wonder if the over the top attack on Arizona about the immigration issue wasn’t a punishment or warning for trying to pass the “prove your eligible” law.


14 posted on 01/17/2011 5:59:34 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (RIP Royal Marshall, you ran the good race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carley
It isn't a diversion. It is just part of the overall pattern.

The BC gives us a good and simple way to get people who normally are out of touch with politics and economics, to understand that Obama is not trustworthy and he is hiding something. Most people can understand and relate to that.

Chris Matthews, "Why doesn't he just release the Birth Certificate?"

15 posted on 01/17/2011 6:03:57 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (RIP Royal Marshall, you ran the good race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Carley
"The birth certificate issue is a diversion from the fact that this man is destroying our economy, our national security, and our standing in the rest of the world, who sees him as weak weak weak."

The birth certificate issue is real. Beerock is not a natural born citizen! This issue is a finger in the conservatives eye, saying, Beerock the alien, can destroy the economy, national security, and our standing in the rest of the world and there's nothing you conservatives do about it.

16 posted on 01/17/2011 6:18:04 AM PST by FW190
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

How could anyone justify voting against verifying the eligibility of a candidate before allowing them on the ballot?

I know what their motivation is (leftists - I know how they think), but I’d sure like to hear how they justify their position on this.


17 posted on 01/17/2011 6:21:17 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Obviously, voting for it would make them a racist because this is all about Obama and not whether a candidate has qualified for the office of president.

They are mental midgets.

18 posted on 01/17/2011 6:45:04 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (RIP Royal Marshall, you ran the good race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

The “race card” is simply all the left has left these days to justify their ideology, isn’t it?


19 posted on 01/17/2011 6:46:12 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MrB

yes


20 posted on 01/17/2011 6:46:37 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (RIP Royal Marshall, you ran the good race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson