Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/17/2011 6:21:30 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

It is not aa reform, it is a takeover by government pf part of the economy pure and simple.


2 posted on 01/17/2011 6:23:48 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
For Schumer or any libtard to make any comment on what we would think about a bill they never even read is just insulting on so many levels.

Here's a suggestion.....

How about making it law that a bill must be out in the public, not subject to amendment for 30 days prior to floor votes. In order to bring it to a floor vote, each legislator must take a test regarding the content of the bill. If the legislators don't get a grade past 70%, they can't vote on the bill due to ignorance of what they are doing.

3 posted on 01/17/2011 6:27:41 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

But will the Senate vote on the repeal? Why would Reid allow it?


4 posted on 01/17/2011 6:41:02 AM PST by LALALAW (one of the asses whose sick of our "ruling" classes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Democrats lied as usual. They are all socialists. Pelousey ‘allowed’ them to vote against it to get re-elected. Now they will deftly vote against repeal with the usual Democrat spin.


5 posted on 01/17/2011 6:41:06 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

After the beating they took in NOV, some of them might change their minds.


11 posted on 01/17/2011 12:11:59 PM PST by GailA (2012 rally cry DEMOCRATS and RINOS are BAD for the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
An argument I would like to see used more often, when targeting proponents of Obamacare, is that many of them, by their own admission, did not fully read the thing before approving it. If a legislature doesn't have time to fully read legislation before approving it, what exactly is his job? How can someone who votes on legislation without reading it not be regarded as abandoning their duty?

Incidentally, one needn't fully read legislation to vote against it, if one reads enough to know that--regardless of what else the legislation may contain--it contains portions that are simply not acceptable.

12 posted on 01/17/2011 3:35:48 PM PST by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson