Okay, so we've established that you're a liar as well as an idiot.
This argument is over. Congratulations, you're the only person in the last 40 years to realize that it must be fabricated for all the purely speculative reasons you've given over and over and over and over and somehow think that there's something substantive there that I and the rest of the world have been missing. Good night.
Either you address my concrete points, or there is some validity to what I'm saying. Can't have it both ways. Lots of trivial things get addressed for the first time here on FR. I once caught a guy lying and my points on FR later made it into the national news, so it's irrelevant that I'm the first one to point this one out. Others on FR got Dan Rather fired. I'm forced to repeat myself here, because I guess the truth hurts for you somehow. It's sad really. My initial comment on this thread was offhand really, but it made you so defensive, that I had to review the facts. After doing so, I'm now convinced Nichols is completely full of crap.
King meets Nichols and compliments her on her role: Neither noteworthy nor historical.
King convinces Nichols not to quit her marginal part because of its social significance: Very historical.
Nichols then waits about 42 years to share this story with the world? Not entirely believable.
I'm just saying.
BTW, you wouldn't last very long in NYC or the future, as sarcasm and hyperbole are completely lost on you.