Posted on 01/17/2011 6:28:17 PM PST by markomalley
Nice piece, Byron, but no humongous revelations contained herein. Sorry.
he’s a GWB hater and a truther. he reminds me of keith olbermann MUCH more than sarah palin.
So he was a truther as well.
I don’t even know what to say, in some very small way I feel sorry for the guy, because he was clearly mentally ill, and in dire need of help he obviously didn’t get.
I hope that the medical community can help this guy, if only so as to make him sane enough to recognize what he did. At the very least he should become cognizant of just how sick his actions were.
Sad sad sad story from start to finish.
Yes he hated Christians Christians like Tea Partyers.
Speaking of Looney Tunes, as in a certain cartoon blog,
Jerry Beck’s Cartoon Brew blog has this:
http://www.cartoonbrew.com/bad-ideas/was-arizona-shooter-obsessed-with-waking-life.html
>>Was Arizona Shooter Obsessed with Waking Life?
>>If something is too difficult to explain, just blame cartoons. So now some people are beginning to suggest that Jared Loughner, the gunman who went on a shooting rampage in Arizona that killed six people, may have been a fan of Richard Linklaters 2001 rotoscope-animation film Waking Life. Last night on 60 Minutes, friends of the shooter said he was obsessed with the film. The connection stems from Loughners obsession with lucid dreaminga mental state in which youre aware that youre dreamingwhich is a central theme of Waking Life.
>>Fans of the film are so worried that theyve already started publishing pre-emptive defenses of the film, like this one at the Brown Tweed Society:
—— Waking Life kept popping up in my mind because Jared Loughner wrote a lot about the blurred lines between dreams and reality. He also asked a lot of difficult questions about government and social control, questions which mirror many of those posed in Waking Life. Before his dark mental illnesses really took hold of him, some of Loughners questions contained a degree of reasonable skepticism grounded in established, though perhaps poorly understood on his part, tenets of philosophy and linguistics. He asked it in a poor, ill-suited context of course, but the question Loughner posed to Gabrielle Giffords at the much-discussed 2007 public forumWhat is government if words have no meaning?is a valid inquiry grounded in the assumption that government and other human social abstractions are primarily linguistic constructions. Its exactly the kind of question that prompts much of Waking Lifes extended dialogue segments.
I’d prefer they just quickly execute the POS.
Noory claims C2C is nonpartisan and not political but after six years or so of calling G.W. Bush everything but president and now getting furious at guests who don't address Obama as President Obama, I find it hard to believe that Noory is telling the truth.
I wonder if Loughner is C2C fan.
Well it's a well know fact, sonny Jim, that there's a group of the five wealthiest people in the world known as the pentaverate, who run everything in the world, including the newspapers. And meet tri-annually at a secret country mansion known as, the Meadows. .......The Queen, The Vatican, The Gettys, The Rothchilds and Col. Sanders before he went tets up.
Oh, I hated the Col. with his wee beady eyes, and that smug look on his face, Oh you're gonna buy my chicken, Oohh...... Because he puts an addictive chemical in his chicken that makes you crave for it nightly, smartass!
And do you know what the Colonel does with the chicken ***es?
He sells those to McDonald!
Of course human language is a manmade construction.
As such, it is only an abstraction of reality.
It doesn’t require any particular genius to realize this. Loughner seemed to think this notion was some sort of amazing insight on his part.
In fact, "misplaced outrage" should be the operative term to respond to leftist attacks on conservatives over this event.
Nope...he was just our every day truther off his meds....
There have been multiple mass shootings tied to truthers now... and the fact is...this info is going main stream...
Truthers are being exposed...
Just as long as he recognized what he did, on a cogent level.
Works for me otherwise.
I’ve always hated the “insanity defense” and it shouldn’t be up to jurors or judges or anyone else to determine if a murderer is nuts, or just sometimes nuts, or just nuts when he did his evil deed.
Ted Bundy was apparently a very intelligent man. But he was also a psychopathic murderer. So whether this AZ bastard is as aware and cognizant of what he was doing as old Bundy was makes no difference to me. I want him dead ASAP so not one more dime (than necessary for trial) of his victims and victims families tax payer money is spent to house and feed him.
I never had a problem with the insanity plea... But it should have been an 'AND' statement, not a 'Get out of Jail' card.
If guilty, the ruling should be: 'Insane AND Guilty' - not, 'Not Guilty by reason of Insanity'... that's just crazy. I'm certainly sorry that the murderer's brain was scrambled - but that's true about most murderers. If he's guilty of murder - than he's guilty of murder.
Love love love this movie!
He may be on to something or on something.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.