Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Plan to Admit Mexican Trucks
Townhall.com ^ | January 18, 2011 | Phyllis Schlafley

Posted on 01/18/2011 5:21:20 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Kaslin; publana; deadmenvote; tuffydoodle; secondamendmentkid; re_nortex; Lorianne; Wage Slave; ...

Concept ping!


21 posted on 01/18/2011 7:38:55 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
August 24, 2007
TEXAS governor rapped for paving way for construction of Trans-Texas Corridor
One News Now | Chad Groening
FR Posted 08/25/2007 by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Texas Governor Rick Perry is being called to task by an author and investigative journalist for vetoing bills that would have blocked construction of the controversial Trans-Texas Corridor.

Dr. Jerome Corsi has been one of the leading voices warning the American public about the consequences of the Trans-Texas Corridor, which will be part of a superhighway -- purported to be four football fields wide -- that will allow Mexican trucks to enter the U.S. and traverse the core of the country all the way to Canada.

The best-selling author asserts that Governor Perry cleared the way for construction to begin in his state when he vetoed several bills passed by the Legislature that would have stalled the project.

"Governor Perry has been 100 percent gung-ho in building this road," says Corsi. "The Legislature voted a two-year moratorium, it voted a redefinition of eminent domain -- [and] Governor Perry vetoed them. [On] at least one of those measures, he waited until the Texas Legislature was out of session so it couldn't even override his veto."

Corsi says it is unfortunate that there has been political pressure to get the project started. "The Federal Highway Administration's lawyer wrote letters threatening the Texas Legislature to cut off federal highway funds if they got in the way of this Trans-Texas Corridor," he says.

Corsi believes the same pressure will be applied on other states, like Oklahoma, to go along with the project. He suggests that would mean a loss of more American jobs and could pose a threat to U.S. sovereignty.


NASCO Map of Corridor

NASCO Members----United States
Texas Dept. of Transportation
Iowa Department of Transportation
State of Oklahoma
Minnesota Dept. of Transportation
Bell County, Texas
Denton County, Texas
Tarrant County, Texas
Webb County, Texas
Jackson County, Missouri
City of Denton, Texas
City of Ft. Worth, Texas
City of Gainesville, Texas
City of Kansas City, Missouri
International Trade Institute of the Americas
Free Trade Alliance San Antonio
Port San Antonio
United States - Mexico Chamber of Commerce
Kansas City SmartPort
The Ardmore Development Authority, City of Ardmore, Oklahoma
Belton Economic Development Corporation
The Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
The Allen Group
Hillwood - Alliance Texas
The Ambassador Bridge Detroit/Windsor Crossing
American Airlines
Blackwood, Langworthy & Tyson, Kansas City law firm
Cadre Technologies
Franco Eleuteri & Associates
EWI Risk Services, Inc.
GrowthNet Trading, LLC
International Bank of Commerce
Lockheed Martin
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores
PROTECT-US, Inc.
Scrub Oak Technologies
Strasburger & Price Law Firm
Trans Am Group
Yellow Roadway Corporation Worldwide

=================================

NASCO: For the Record

The Dallas-based organization, North America's SuperCorridor Coalition (NASCO), which receives federal money to promote an agenda of tolled transnational corridors, has raised some eyebrows with their marketing literature touting superhighways, not just in Texas, but across the continent.

NASCO insists that its interests are not directly connected with Gov. Perry's Trans-Texas Corridor, even though the organization changed its name in 2004 from "North America's SuperHighway Coalition" (a name adopted in 1996 at the start of the "internet superhighway" craze) to "North America's SuperCorridor Coalition," a change that coincided with the announcement of the Trans-Texas Corridor. In an extended retort entitled "NASCO Speaks Out," officials of NASCO wrote on their website, "Our name and our initiatives have nothing to do with the proposed new corridor in Texas. It is a coincidence upon which fringe groups have been able to capitalize and confuse people."

NASCO leadership has also been dismayed to see their materials promoting brightly-colored "super-corridors" across North America being used by the "misinformed" to warn people about the proposed plans beyond the Trans-Texas Corridor.

NASCO's leaders write: We … used to have a marketing map on the homepage of our website that had I-35 and our connecting corridors greatly enlarged for viewing purposes and presentations. This was used by conspiracy theorists to show the "blueprint" for the (nonexistent) 'new NAFTA Superhighway.' Some people unfamiliar with our organization were confused and believed these falsehoods. The map was a marketing tool, and has since been updated to show the corridor a bit more drawn to scale (although it is still is not drawn exactly to scale.) The fringe groups continue to use the old, enlarged map to scare people, although we use only the new (scaled down) map.

SOURCE Thom White is editor of CITIZINE, Austin, Texas. Contact Thom @ CITIZINE@CITIZINEmag.com

22 posted on 01/18/2011 8:58:49 AM PST by Liz (There's a new definition of bipartisanship in Washington -- it's called "former member.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mountainfolk
We passed a large truck on I40 yesterday which had Mexican markings and thought the new regulations must now be in effect. Perhaps the Mexican truck traffic in the US is already now legal?

Has been since the Bush administration. Obama is merely amplifying what was started then...

the infowarrior

23 posted on 01/18/2011 9:22:34 AM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior
From the exterior, the truck was older but the body was in good condition. We have not seen Mexican trucks or truckers for some time which is why we took note of this one. Previous ones we saw rather frequently and some in apparent good shape and others not. Maybe the bureaucracy did some serious cleaning up this time around.
24 posted on 01/18/2011 10:16:02 AM PST by mountainfolk (God Bless the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; SwinneySwitch

This must be a sop to the trial lawyers. You wouldn’t believe the number of trial lawyers in South Texas who advertise that they sue trucking companies that cause accidents involving injury. This will increase the number of serious injuries caused by tractor trailers colliding with passenger cars. The trial lawyers will file more lawsuits and generate more profits. Some of these profits will be donated to DemocRAT politicians and causes.


25 posted on 01/18/2011 10:59:32 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Oh Liz, why did you have to bring that back up? Paulsen said it had been trashed, don’t you remember? I know that leaves the question about why Hillary went to the North American Union meeting in Mexico City last December. You’re not saying that Paulsen lied to us, are you?


26 posted on 01/18/2011 11:14:46 AM PST by B4Ranch (Do NOT remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

President Bush actually opened the door wider during his Presidency, and extended the miles “in country” the foreign trucks could ply on our roadways...

We pitched a fit about it back then on FR, and the fervor it caused died down to a low roar after the fact...

Not sure they (administration and government)got everything ironed out to allow that to happen, IIRC...

Obama would probably give them all charge cards with thousands in a balance to buy diesel while in the states...

Screw all that other stuff about the safety and road worthyness of these trucks...


27 posted on 01/18/2011 11:49:12 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Paulsen said that had been trashed, don’t you remember? I know that leaves the question about why Hillary went to the North American Union meeting in Mexico City last December.

You’re not saying that Paulsen lied to us, are you?

Duh.

28 posted on 01/18/2011 2:34:10 PM PST by Liz (There's a new definition of bipartisanship in Washington -- it's called "former member.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Tennessee Nana; AuntB

ping


29 posted on 01/19/2011 10:46:37 PM PST by Pelham (Obammunism, the smooth-talking happy -face communist blend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson