Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

Contact my state rep...Leo Berman Tyler Texas.


17 posted on 01/19/2011 9:39:42 PM PST by flowergirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: flowergirl

Berman seems to have a spine. Gotta love Texas. =)

I think it’s pretty much supposed to be people within the state who contact the state legislators, though, which is why we need to rally the troops for action.

IIRC, Berman has introduced a bill which would require a birth certificate to be shown. I don’t know if he would be willing to amend that bill to include some of these other measures. I do believe the additional measures are necessary because...

1. There has already been demonstrated tampering of records by all the actual government bureaucracies that have (or claim to have) records for Obama, so just receiving records doesn’t guarantee lawfulness or accuracy for Obama or anybody else the bureaucracy is willing to cheat for. And bureaucrats have been caught in multiple places accepting bribes to manufacture or falsify vital records, which contaminates the whole pool. A fake BC can be used to get what appears to be a legitimate passport, for instance, and the only way to know which records are contaminated is to examine all the records for a person, including the transaction logs which would reveal tampering. We can’t do that for everybody, but we can at least do it for the person who holds the nuclear football.

And again, it must be reiterated that we already know that Obama’s selective service registration, social security number, and passport all have documented anomalies which strongly suggest tampering by the bureaucrats in those agencies. And the Hawaii DOH has indirectly confirmed through official communications that they have no legally-valid BC for Obama, even though they’ve made public statements implying the exact opposite. So we’re not dreaming up trouble; trouble has already been revealed in Obama’s case, by the very government agencies involved.

2. We don’t have a definition for “natural born citizen”, and unless the courts rule on that definition, the Constitution will be interpreted inconsistently by secretaries rather than by the only people the Constitution allows to interpret it.

3. Even in states where a SOS is required to “verify Constitutional eligibility” there is no mechanism to hold the SOS accountable to obey that, and never can be until there is a binding definition of “natural born citizen”. Even with a binding definition, the only people who the courts would allow to sue over eligibility are people who can be easily shut down politically if they DO sue. So there needs to be a politically-neutral process for holding an SOS accountable to determine eligibility truthfully.

We were just visiting the Tyler, TX area in late December. Nice people down there. Good, salt of the earth people.

Maybe you or somebody you know could contact Berman and see if he is willing to hear some suggestions for how the bill could be improved. If he is then you could put him in contact with me and I could let him know my concerns. Or anybody could share the concerns with him. I am willing and eager to do anything I can to help out.


19 posted on 01/20/2011 6:38:38 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson