Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Az Supreme Court: Law doesn't mandate Spanish insurance offers
eastvalleytribune.com ^ | Thursday, January 20, 2011 8:19 pm | By Howard Fischer

Posted on 01/22/2011 2:29:31 PM PST by DeaconBenjamin

Insurance companies don't have to make state-mandated offers of certain kinds of coverage in Spanish, even if that's the language the person speaks, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

In a unanimous decision, the justices acknowledged that state law requires insurers to tell motorists they have the right to purchase protection from situations where another driver is either uninsured or lacks sufficient coverage to pay for all the medical bills incurred. And that notice, they said, must be in writing.

But Chief Justice Rebecca Berch said if state lawmakers wanted to require insurance companies to provide that notice in Spanish, they would have spelled that out in state law. Absent that, Berch said, there is no obligation to translate the offering.

Berch also said the question of whether the motorist buying the insurance understood what was being offered is irrelevant. The only thing that is, she said, is whether the offer was made as required by law.

"Whether an offer was made turns only on whether a reasonable person would understand that a proposal of terms was made,'' she wrote. The subjective understanding of that offer by the motorist does not matter, Berch said.

The case involves Luis Ballesteros who bought an automobile insurance policy from American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin.

Because his primary language is not English, a Spanish-speaking staffer helped him complete his application. The insurance agent also gave Ballesteros an English-language form, approved by the state Department of Insurance, informing him of his right to purchase these optional coverages.

Ballesteros signed the form in the place indicating he declined.

Several months later his mother-in-law, who was covered under his policy, died in a collision with an uninsured driver. When his claim for coverage was denied, Ballesteros sued, saying the failure to offer him the coverage as required by state law means he is entitled to it automatically.

A trial judge agreed, saying the English-language offer was not designed to bring Ballesteros' attention to the offer. But Berch said that was wrong.

Berch said while Arizona at one time required motorists to purchase both types of insurance, the current law says it only must be offered. It also directs the Department of Insurance to come up with the proper form.

She said that form complies with the law because it would be understood by a reasonable person.

Berch said the fact that state regulators also approved a Spanish-language form does not make its use mandatory. The justice cited a legal brief submitted by the state insurance director saying that form is provided "as a matter of convenience for insurers, rather than a mandate for use.''


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: english; insurance; rebeccaberch; spanish

1 posted on 01/22/2011 2:29:33 PM PST by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Que?


2 posted on 01/22/2011 2:33:17 PM PST by coaltrain (Obama's a Harvard lawyer like Elvis was a Black Belt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Only fools sign documents they don’t completely understand.


3 posted on 01/22/2011 2:35:06 PM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
If ya wanna live here - learn the language. It's really that simple.

There can be some serious downsides to being ignorant of your country of residence's predominant language. Tough tacos, señor!

4 posted on 01/22/2011 2:37:35 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Although the availability of the option is mandated, I imagine the insurance company priced it for profit and would prefer to sell more than less especially since it helps to defray of extraneous liabilities and litigation costs such as that created by this incident and report.

I bet Ballesteros new what he was declining but was ignorant of its value.


5 posted on 01/22/2011 2:41:30 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Good for AZ.


6 posted on 01/22/2011 2:42:46 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
He got rid of his MIL, that should be enough for anybody. AND he wants cash? He's just being greedy.

/johnny

7 posted on 01/22/2011 2:45:03 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Only fools sign documents they don’t completely understand.

If you thing you understand all of the fine print in all the documents you sign, then you probably are more oblivious than the person who couldn't read English. A couple of good teams of lawyers can spend several years on litigation, and bill hundreds of thousands of dollars before a judge will determine what the contract really means.

And just because a phrase has one meaning today doesn't mean that it will have the same meaning after a judge decides a case next week.

8 posted on 01/22/2011 2:49:28 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Only fools sign documents they don’t completely understand.

He understood, it was translated for him. He opted out because that rider would have cost a little bit. Later, when he needed it, he didn't "understand".

9 posted on 01/22/2011 3:00:21 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Don't tell Obama what comes after a trillion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

What do you want to bet the “uninsured motorist” who ran into Balesteros’ mother-in-law was an illegal alien?”


10 posted on 01/22/2011 3:08:04 PM PST by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

They come here for the money. The money that buys them the life they can’t live in the Spanish-speaking crap-holes they ran away from. A nations currency is a nations language. Ours is printed in English. Learn it.


11 posted on 01/22/2011 3:09:41 PM PST by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Some of the Florida ambulance chasing firms are advertising about UM coverage and offering to sue your agent for malpractice should you not have it when you need it. One of the strange provisions is the requirement to decline in writing stacking coverage on a single vehicle policy.

Nice to see judges opt not to legislate from the bench.

12 posted on 01/22/2011 3:14:30 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012: don't retreat, just restock [chg'd to comply w/ The Civility in Discourse Act of 2011])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

Come here & don’t speak Engligh?

Not our fault!!! YOUR fault!!!


13 posted on 01/22/2011 3:15:03 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers
The Wolves Are At The Door!

Stop Them With The Truth

Donate To Free Republic

14 posted on 01/22/2011 3:20:50 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

What about traffic signs? Are they in Spanish? And traffic tickets? - are DUI arrests made in Spanish?


15 posted on 01/22/2011 3:21:59 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Yo no Se. that catchall phrase when you know you’ve screwed up and have to fall back on your own stupidity.


16 posted on 01/22/2011 9:42:59 PM PST by vette6387 (Enough Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson