To: Berlin_Freeper
April 14, 1964, to April 14, 1965,
it appears this rag doesn't have proofreaders
2 posted on
01/25/2011 12:14:35 AM PST by
Not now, Not ever!
(Girlfriend suggested I use pelosi in place of swear words, A good idea, I think)
To: Berlin_Freeper
they better change the date again as I don’t believe Lincoln was still alive in 1964 1965. Somebody goofed here.
3 posted on
01/25/2011 12:15:31 AM PST by
fish hawk
(reporter to old Indian: you lived here on the reservation all your life? Old Indian, "not yet".)
To: Berlin_Freeper
1964/1965? Now THAT’S revisionism.
To: Berlin_Freeper
I wonder he had anything to do with those Nostradamus and 2012 segments on the History Channel.
To: Berlin_Freeper
He dated the document April 14, 1965? He must be the forger Dan Rather hired.
9 posted on
01/25/2011 12:30:22 AM PST by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Misprinted dates in the article notwithstanding, this guy’s reputation as being a historical document expert are toast. Probably could have named his price as a forensic expert for high dollar auction houses, but now couldn’t get hired to flip burgers.
10 posted on
01/25/2011 12:48:17 AM PST by
SpaceBar
To: Berlin_Freeper
Oh boy, the comments are going to be entertaining on this one.
15 posted on
01/25/2011 3:02:19 AM PST by
Rocky
(REPEAL IT!)
To: Berlin_Freeper
I believe there’s a job opening in Hawaii where he might find work.
To: Berlin_Freeper
Owen Gingerich, who is the world's leading authority on Copernicus'
de Revolutionibus has seen and catalogued virtually every existing first and second edition. There are only a couple of hundred in existence. Many first edition copies which had damaged pages, were repaired with second edition pages. "Improving" an historical document in this manner is called "sophistication" and the resulting document is a "sophisticated lady".
The "sophisticated ladies" are actually worth less than the original document with the damaged pages would have been.
18 posted on
01/25/2011 3:11:43 AM PST by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
obviously Booth was a CIA plant or patsy...i mean its obvious. probably was the second gunman in jfk murder as well...
22 posted on
01/25/2011 3:32:09 AM PST by
Irishguy
To: Berlin_Freeper
Well at least he doesn’t have the rebels bombing Pearl Harbor. The left wing revisionist history about the Civil War is rampant. My favorite is seeing the post-Reconstruction democrats being renamed “conservatives.”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson