I cant' vouch for it that it's credible!
However, one would think it's very strange that every single records possible for the pResident in the Whit-Hut has been sealed like a can of tuna in olive oil. We do NOT know anything about this "plant" that purportedly is dismantling our country DOWN to a Marxist/Islamic country. UK media just revealed he secretly is behind the "uprising" aka Islamic Brotherhood takeover in Egypt, hmmm!!
Then again if you start peeling the "Onion" it becomes a total Constitutional crisis and mess that we've never experienced before, involving enablers and high ranker from both parties who will do the utmost to protect themselves and sweep it under the rug. It's like a "Titanic" on collision course and ALL its "passengers" will go down with the ship launched by outside chess players. We certainly live in some very interesting times!!!
>>> I cant’ vouch for it that it’s credible!
Well, We DO KNOW that SCOTUS heard the case on the 11th.
1. If SCOTUS had ruled in favor of Obama, or had they dismissed the case, the media would have been ALL OVER IT!
2. If SCOTUS had ruled in favor of the plaintiff, the alternative media would have been all over it!
3. So what we have now is SCOTUS unable to rule (or publish its ruling) for national security reasons.
Is this where we are now??? SCOTUS cannot rule against or for the plaintiff for fear of what will happen???
IS THAT THEIR JOB?????
Why havn’t we heard anything from the plaintiff about the case???... Are they under a gag order?
Or is it as the article suggests that SCOTUS has instructed the president to resign under other false pretense?
I can understand the president, media, and congressmen playing hush-hush... but not SCOTUS. Who holds them accountable?
I think Boehner and the RNC want to avoid a confrontation and will work to cover for Obama. They'll try to "disarm" issues by cashing them for tax and regulatory relief (see my last).
Hope not, but 'fraid so.