Well said. The requirement for POTUS was written by honorable men for honorable men...
The absence of honor among the men and women occupying our cultural institutions should sound the alarm for all men and women who love this nation and its founding principles. Today it is a likely usurper in the White House. Tomorrow it will be something else.
What is more disturbing than having a likely usurper occupying the White House is that so few **honorable** men have stood forth to object. Honor has been proven dead on arrival among our legislators, courts, electoral college, attorney generals, secretaries of state, the highest military, and the Marxist and conservative media. ( Most disappointing was our silent conservative media.)
Some of the traitorous afterbirthers have argued that the Constitution does not define the meaning of natural born citizen, provide a requirement that the president present certifiable proof, or outline a means for removing an ineligible president. They deliberately fail to understand that the Constitution rests upon a foundation of honor and good will.
Well...As you pointed out the Constitution was written by honorable men with the knowledge that this experiment in self-rule would stand or fall on the sense of honor among its people.
It is impossible to craft laws tight enough impose righteousness upon a dishonorable people. If the Constitution were the size of the IRS code, with every clause defined, evil would eventually leak through.
The afterbirthers disgust me. It gives me no comfort to know that if and when fascist tyranny comes to this nation, that ( as Yuri Besmenov pointed out) they will be the first to be lined up against the wall and shot.
Greg, have you noticed there are have been no responses on posts #127, #130, #132, or #133?