Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMR 4350

The problem is, you can’t stockpile enough to prepare for everyone.

It also is not moral to assume others will give you items you yourself did not set aside while you hadthe chance, but now they need to survive.

The caveat is that not all people would be turned away. If some people have needed skills that would benefit such groups, there would probably be some kind of arrangements worked out. But many of the people probably will not have any skills or abilities that will be needed in the immediate or long-term futures.


38 posted on 01/30/2011 11:03:42 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

It’s one thing to take people in short term for protection, say for example during riots where law will return in a short period of time.

It’s another thing to take people in long term.

Question people need to start asking themselves,Can I turn someone away and can I put someone out?

I don’t think there are too many people on this sight that would turn someone away and leave them to face a mob by themselves.

If there is, they are not someone I would want to depend on to cover my back because they’ll do the same to me to protect themselves.

That being said, the question then becomes when do you turn someone out?

Having a set of rules to go with the emergency supplies is just as important as the supplies themselves.


40 posted on 01/31/2011 6:56:28 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson