[PSYCHO-FREEP]

That may not be true, the judge ruled on an injunction brought to the court by 26 states. Not all of them.

It is already a law and cannot be declared void in total, based on severability. The judges ruling can also be overturned by the 11th Circuit or by SCOTUS.

This is the latest approach that the Democrats and the White House have declared they will take. In the mean time, they intend to ignore the decision. The States who filed the injunction will then have to file a “Contempt of court” claim.

And the way I understand it, this still only applies to the 26 States who filed the injunction.

It's rapidly becoming a first class truck load of worms.

[4Speed]

Wrong Psycho.....as you understand it.... its null and void as YOU. Do not understand

UNCONSTITUTIONAL NEEDS NO INJUNCTION

AND THERE WAS NO SERVABILITY CLAUSE