Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2011 7:32:01 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Been there. Done that.

Gun Ownership Mandatory In Kennesaw, Georgia -— Crime Rate Plummets

tysk news ^ | 1997 | Baldwin

Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:29:03 PM by doug from upland

The New American magazine reminds us that March 25th marked the 16th anniversary of Kennesaw, Georgia’s ordinance requiring heads of households (with certain exceptions) to keep at least one firearm in their homes.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1818862/posts


2 posted on 02/03/2011 7:35:02 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Isn't the whole debate about Obamacare that government is forcing people to buy something that they don't want. Look everyone over the age of consent should have a firearm and know how to use it. It is just common sense. Just like everyone should have health insurance. But hey if you want to run the risks it is your life. Part of freedom is the freedom to do something foolish. I don't like the government telling me what to do, even when on the rare occasion it is telling me to do something that I happen to agree with.
5 posted on 02/03/2011 7:45:21 AM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

While it might seem to be a good idea to force everyone to be armed, it is a violation of property rights. No man nor group of men has a right to force someone to use their property in some given way. Neither does the state. Only force or the threat of force would get compliance.

Obamacare is a violation of property rights. Obamacare is a violation of the US constitution.

All those do-gooders in the federal government that want to “fix” healthcare or health insurance cannot legally do that. They have not been granted that authority in the US Constitution. It is NOT their job.

I don’t know if the SD constitution allows the SD law. I would still be against it, because I believe property rights should not be infringed by any government.

It would do all of us on the right good to determine exactly what the philosophical foundations are for our beliefs. If we just do things because we intuitively like them, we are just like the left statists except we have different preferences.


6 posted on 02/03/2011 7:47:36 AM PST by MichiganConservative (Terrorists don't commit genocide. That's what governments do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
No matter how good it sounds in principal, it is unconstitutional to force a citizen to purchase a private product.

Now, if they want to raise taxes, then offer a tax credit for each purchased firearm, that's another matter. That's also how they'll eventually get around the unconstitutional individual mandate in the Health Care bill.

10 posted on 02/03/2011 8:04:11 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

My own belief is that for the same reason that our right to vote carries with it the responsibility to do so, the God given right to own and bear arms carries the responsibility to own your own gun and to stay current on it.


14 posted on 02/03/2011 8:34:43 AM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson