Posted on 02/06/2011 11:31:42 AM PST by Nachum
Why would a proto-feminist Secretary of State be silent on the very real potential of a patriarchal Islamist system like the Muslim Brotherhood gaining power in Egypt? Hillary Clinton's deafening silence in full view of her boss's Muslim sympathies as well as her own complicity in dialoguing with those who wish to subjugate women worldwide has left even die-hard Hillary supporters baffled and disgusted.
From Reverend Amy at noquarterusa:
How can Secretary Clinton continue to support President Obama in his push for the Muslim Brotherhood to be involved in governing Egypt? The Muslim Brotherhood wants to implement Sharia Law, for heaven's sake. How in the world can Secretary Clinton stand by this? How can she possibly condone the impact this will have on women in Egypt given her lifelong work for women to have full human rights? How? I simply do not understand this. It seems to fly in the face of everything for which she has stood.
It's simple really, she must agree with her boss despite the ‘woman's progress is human progress' rhetoric she spouts at the U.N.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
That’s easy to figure:
1) The Muslim Brotherhood is definitely anti-American (’nuff said)
2) Hitlery is definitely anti-female (look at her)
3) Hitlery is definitely anti-Semitic (hates Israel with a passion . . . American Jews can’t figure that out)
Next question . . .
Just like her superficial spouse.
Let me stick my wet finger in the air to see which way the wind is blowing. (No offense Monica)
I’m glad some on the left seem to be getting a clue, even if it’s only a tiny one and they’ll still probably rationalize it away in their desperate loyalty to Obama.
Slick trained her well, she has no moral compass when it comes to hanging onto her 'perceived' power.
Soros and the Journalistas sold out the Jews. Why wouldn’t Hillary sell out women?
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
There is an assumption that hillary clintoon is a female. Oh, puleeeze!
Because there is some return to her. She isn’t really “for” ANY group except the Hillary group.
She’s been a self centered sell out her entire life. Would not defend America or its people.
Hillary´s a commie from way back. Feminism is just a sham issue for her...just a prop to hoodwink dupes.
Just think back to her kiss with Suha Arafat. That was the only genuine act in that whole Kabuki that followed, with her pledging allegiance to Jews and Israel. The simple fact, as with her FJB epithet to Dick Morris, is that she’s virulently anti-Semitic, along with her rapist husband, and sides with the PLO every time.
She ought to be pointing out that adopting the keep the woman in the home and out of public life stance is what has kept Muslim countries two or more centuries behind the West. On the other hand maybe it is just as well that they don’t seem to realize this and change.
So-called feminists like Hillary only care about women in America, if even that.
Hillary is a grifter, pure and simple.
And, like most liberal women, would be nowhere had they not married into fame.
I’ll think more of her when she shows a semblance of achievement on her own.
She might study Sarah Palin for techniques.
“Why would a proto-feminist Secretary of State be silent”
Hillary is no feminist. When she found out that her husband was a serial rapist she stood by her man and had his victims investigated and smeared. Hard to believe that such a negative kook is employed by the federal government. Barry does not see any problem with sending her around the world representing the U.S. spreading her special brand of hate.
The Clintons never met a muslim they couldn’t favor at the expense of Christian or Jewish lives.....(i.e... Yassir Arafat, Kosovo Liberation Army...)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.