Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another post-tragedy shot from the hip
BND.com ^ | February 08, 2011 | J.R. LABBE

Posted on 02/08/2011 10:18:14 AM PST by Neil E. Wright

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., and Rep. Caroline McCarthy, D-N.Y., are proposing legislation that would reinstate a federal ban on the manufacture, import and sale of high-capacity ammunition magazines like the ones Jared Loughner is accused of using in the horrific Tucson shootings that left six dead and 13 wounded, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz.

This latest manifestation of the "do-something syndrome" surprises nary one gun-rights supporter and explains why sales of high-capacity mags have jumped in recent weeks.

Ammo mags containing more than 10 bullets were illegal under a federal "assault weapons" ban in place from 1994 to 2004. That didn't mean folks couldn't own or sell them. Companies could manufacture them only for purchase by law enforcement and government agencies.

(Excerpt) Read more at bnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: 2amendment; banglist; gungrabbers
But there's one label I'm going to do my darnedest to never let stick: victim.

America! It's about

★ FREEDOM! ★

★ Estimated Value – PRICELESS! ★

1 posted on 02/08/2011 10:18:20 AM PST by Neil E. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
Ammo mags containing more than 10 bullets were illegal under a federal "assault weapons" ban in place from 1994 to 2004

No they weren't. The manufacture, import or sale of NEW magazines and firearms which could hold more than 10 rounds was made 'illegal'by the ban. "Pre-ban' weapons and magazines could still be sold and, most relevant to Tuscon shooting, used.

2 posted on 02/08/2011 10:26:34 AM PST by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright

I would love, LOVE to see Chris Christie name Laut’s replacement, if the 87 yo Senator could no longer serve...for whatever reason.


3 posted on 02/08/2011 10:31:49 AM PST by proudpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

What EVer, WayneS. From 1994 to 2004, nobody in the House got shot, and after that they did, so the total ban worked. he he heee! /s, as if I needed the tag


4 posted on 02/08/2011 10:32:30 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Loutenburger is an embarrassment, the political equivalent of an ambulance-chasing shyster.

We have yet to see a tragedy he hasn’t tried to exploit.


5 posted on 02/08/2011 10:47:22 AM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Neil E. Wright
Why can't natural causes take that POS Lautencadever out of here ? He is a disgrace to the human race .
6 posted on 02/08/2011 10:55:48 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson