Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beyond Conservatism: Is CPAC Going Omnisexual Proud?
The Patriot Post ^ | February 8, 2011 | B.P. Terpstra

Posted on 02/08/2011 12:24:59 PM PST by AustralianConservative

More Americans now identify with the prolife movement than ever before in polling history, according to Gallup. As well, 31 out of 31 voter-friendly states have rejected "gay marriage" and even Democrats are losing faith in Al Gore's climate alarmist theology. But as America turns right, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), an annual political conference for so-called conservatives, is turning left.

How? In another example, of political correctness gone mad, CPAC co-supporter GOProud (a "gay conservative" group) is holding a party, headlined by two-hit wonder pop star, Sophie B. Hawkins, a decision that seems designed to promote controversy.

In her GO Magazine interview, dated July 10, 2008, Hawkins proclaimed, "I love my phrase 'omnisexual,'" and pontificated about the meaning of love. "The truth about omnisexuality is my sexuality is spiritual. It's creative. I absolutely can fall in love with any gender if I love the person's mind, heart and soul."

The evangelical omnisexual and Hillary Clinton loyalist isn't one to hold back, to be sure. "I grew up in a family where there wasn't monogamy. Both parents had affairs and did whatever they wanted," revealed the progressive Los Angeles Women's Music Festival-friendly green singer.

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotpost.us ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: conservatism; cpac; faggots; goproud; lasalvia
http://patriotpost.us/commentary/2011/02/08/beyond-conservatism-is-cpac-going-omnisexual-proud/
1 posted on 02/08/2011 12:25:05 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

The funny thing is that liberals are ignoring this and harassing the Koch brothers instead and they have minimal influence on GOP politics.


2 posted on 02/08/2011 12:29:19 PM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

Someone should start a “conservative” bestiality or incest group and attempt to co-sponsor CPAC. After all, who are we to judge who can marry if they are in LOVE?


3 posted on 02/08/2011 12:30:08 PM PST by montag813 (http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

They will also want to allow incest. Remember the Columbia professor? The libs couldn’t think of a reason why its not okay. They want us to be like France I guess.


4 posted on 02/08/2011 12:33:10 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php for FR backup site!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I went to an anime cartoon website and found that half of them are about minors and incest. sick. Japan is a sick culture.... then you mention incest, its legal in France as long as both or neither of them are adults.

They can even marry in France apparently.

crazy inbreds.


5 posted on 02/08/2011 12:36:10 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php for FR backup site!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Someone should start a “conservative” bestiality or incest group and attempt to co-sponsor CPAC.

And the pedophiles, too. Look for them to be lining up for their "rights" very soon.

6 posted on 02/08/2011 12:51:21 PM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative
Both parents had affairs and did whatever they wanted," revealed the progressive Los Angeles Women's Music Festival-friendly green singer.

Third generation hippie.

7 posted on 02/08/2011 12:52:27 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country. The thing is, Sarah loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Sodomites have long been in the forefront of the pedophile movement. And, yes, the sodomites and the Islamicists are penetrating (pun intended) CPAC and other “conservative” organizations. Grover Norquist is part of the problem.


8 posted on 02/08/2011 12:53:59 PM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Good point. The funny thing though is that adults-first libertarians at CPAC also never learn. They are like feral teenagers. Conservatives are the parents, always cleaning up after them. No more. They can start their own pretend conservative conference.


9 posted on 02/08/2011 1:02:50 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montag813

31 out of 31 states opposed gay marriage when given the vote, so CPAC and GOProud is left of America.

RE: Your take about bestiality. That’s the problem when people don’t define the term sexual orientation in clear terms.

Sure liberals will scoff – but some professors are already supporting and/or warming up to bestiality.


10 posted on 02/08/2011 1:07:57 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Point taken about the Columbia professor. I guess sexual orientation is a broad term for these people.

I notice too there was little outrage, because they’ve saved all their anger up for conservatives.


11 posted on 02/08/2011 1:11:52 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I’ve worked in Japan and I have to admit that the comics over there are hardcore. More than a few involve young girls being raped by black servicemen too (some kind of sick racist fantasy).


12 posted on 02/08/2011 1:14:41 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

LOL - and made for CPAC.


13 posted on 02/08/2011 1:15:51 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

There is no bottom of the slippery slope. Pretty soon if you don’t abort the baby you can have sex with it.


14 posted on 02/08/2011 1:26:44 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php for FR backup site!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Yes, I note that some American academics have adopted the term intergenerational love.


15 posted on 02/08/2011 1:43:38 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

I am not going to banish or institutionalized homosexuals even thou I believe their acts are sinful indications of a mental or otherwise illness.

Simply put Government is not a health-care provider, nether are our conservative institutions, it is therefore inappropriate to in anyway address the issue of the illness of homosexuality. For or against. It is a illness just like cancer or Schizophrenia. Either way it is none of our business, as we can nether treat the illness nor do have we a right to try.

In the mean time theses individuals have every right to participate in what ever capacity they can safely participate.


16 posted on 02/08/2011 1:43:38 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

Monorprise: Did you read the full piece? Homosexuals have participated and voted conservative for decades. The issue (according to the piece above – click link) is that one group is using tribal politics to (a) play the victim and (b) undermine basic conservative values. A lesbian is quoted in the piece.

When GOProud suits bag conservatives they’re not there to participate – they’re there to undermine.

Talk of institutionalizing homosexuals is just a red herring argument some activists have concocted to distract from the central arguments. Fact: 31 out of 31 voting states voted against gay “marriage” and can’t be ignored.

The fact is Mr. Taxpayer has been paying billions for fatherlessness. Why create more families without fathers? Or why create more babies without access to real-time breast milk?


17 posted on 02/08/2011 1:58:26 PM PST by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AustralianConservative

No I was simply stating that in principle Homosexuality is a disease nothing more nothing less.(Aside from the fact that Homosexuality can lead to sinful acts)


18 posted on 02/08/2011 2:28:48 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson