Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notary Sojac

“We’re just going to have to agree to disagree on this one.”

No...we arent...

If YOU ARE WRONG...YOU will have to live with it...not me...

There is no “right side” of the argument concerning the loss of an American City...

Yes...it’s the worse case senario...but worse case senarios happen...

And the muslims dont lack the will...they only lack the means....

Anyone who thinks Al Q isnt trying to get it’s hands on a nuke is an idiot.

It’s not exactly a secret.

They will eventually buy or build one...


77 posted on 02/09/2011 7:38:18 AM PST by Crim (The Obama Doctrine : A doctrine based on complete ignorance,applied with extreme incompetence..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Crim
It's the integrity of our leadership, not the tools, that count.

If Dubya had wanted to WIN the war on terror, and I mean WIN it decisively, he had the American public totally behind him on 12 Sept 2001.

He chose to piss away that opportunity, Patriot Act or no Patriot Act.

And Obama, with all that power in his hands, will use it against American patriots, not jihadis.

So the Patriot Act has been pretty much inconsequential in stamping out Islamicism.

79 posted on 02/09/2011 7:47:06 AM PST by Notary Sojac (We have had three central banks in America's history: two of them failed and so will this one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Crim

Put Saudi Arabia in charge of seeing that it does not happen. If they fail, a certain religious site is no more.

We might need to lose a city to stop this damned idea that we shouldn’t profile the only religious group whose stated goal is to destroy Western civilization.


81 posted on 02/09/2011 7:53:33 AM PST by listenhillary (20 years in Reverend Wright's church is all I need to determine the "content of his character")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Crim
These are the same arguments that are being used to deprive us of our Second Amendment Rights. Somebody might get hurt or killed so we need to ban guns or high-capacity magazines from freedom loving Americans. If the DHS and TSA would quit with the PC BS and start profiling potential terrorists, we wouldn't need pat downs or naked body scanners depriving us of our 4th Amendment rights either. All of first 10 Amendments are under assault to keep us “safe”.
83 posted on 02/09/2011 7:54:20 AM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Crim; Notary Sojac

According to stories posted on FR, sourced from Wikileaks documents it is likely that Al Queda already has nukes available to them.

The have materials to make the dirty bombs.


86 posted on 02/09/2011 8:01:45 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Crim
You seem to be threatening american cities a lot - very telling

But if we lose our constitution - you can keep your cities - cause they ain't american.

this PATRIOT ACT (so-called) violates 6 of the original 10 amendments.

How dare you defend it and hide behind a flag?

142 posted on 02/09/2011 2:30:56 PM PST by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson