Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RAF Leuchars Tornados scrambled to 'repel' Russian aircraft
The Courier ^ | 2/9/2011 | The Courier

Posted on 02/09/2011 9:35:24 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Many residents of Tayside and Fife reported hearing the jets roaring away from the threatened front-line base shortly after 5am on Tuesday. The unknown planes were soon identified as Russian military aircraft.

When contacted by The Courier, a spokeswoman at the Ministry of Defence (MoD) stressed the Russian aircraft had not encroached into UK airspace.

"Aircraft were launched to identify two unknown aircraft that were flying in international airspace over the North Sea," she said. "They were identified as Russian military aircraft."

The latest incident comes just two weeks after a pair of Russian Bear bombers were intercepted close to Newcastle by crews from Leuchars.

Heartening

It is sure to hearten campaigners, who insist the Fife base represents the best strategic location for the UK's vital Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) teams.

Crews from Leuchars are ready to depart at a just few minutes' notice right around the clock.

At the moment there are fewer than 1000 service personnel at Leuchars, a drop from a peak of around 1800.

Jets from RAF Leuchars have been scrambled more than 50 times in the last five years to intercept Russian military aircraft.

(Excerpt) Read more at thecourier.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; gr4; nato; raf; tornado; tu95

1 posted on 02/09/2011 9:35:27 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

I think that are testing air defense response.


3 posted on 02/09/2011 10:13:44 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

They are testing air defense responses in a number of areas such as Alaska,Norway and Canada.


4 posted on 02/09/2011 10:17:11 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

How many times does the boy cry “Wolf” before no one pays any attention?


5 posted on 02/09/2011 10:38:57 PM PST by Tagurit (Are your pigs fed, watered and ready to fly?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tagurit

There is a reason why NATO/Alaska NORAD and Canadian NORAD Region pilots meet TU-95. NATO/Alaska ,NORAD pilots,and Canadian NORAD Region are to protect our airspace from bombers and further airborne aggression . We do not know the intentions of these bombers that fly into these regions.


6 posted on 02/09/2011 10:50:03 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Here’s an idea:

Don’t send any planes up, or at least keep them close to base. Once the “unknown aircraft” enters your airspace, and doesn’t respond to radio contact, shoot it down.


7 posted on 02/10/2011 12:13:06 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda

You would probably need authorization from the POTUS. No general in NORAD will stick out their neck for that action.


9 posted on 02/10/2011 5:27:54 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda

Yes, but no NORAD or NATO general would ever authorize a shoot down of a TU-95 that because it can easily start a war.


11 posted on 02/10/2011 10:50:03 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

Wartime Yes, Peacetime,No


12 posted on 02/10/2011 10:52:54 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda

You would still authorize such an action.


14 posted on 02/11/2011 4:12:55 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld
I think that are testing air defense response.

Either that or their hearing, it was Bears after all.

15 posted on 02/11/2011 4:15:03 PM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

I am sure bombers would only appear fully armed when there is a war about to pick up. Chances are cities would be destroyed before the bombers appear. It takes 30 minutes for a missile to reach its targets. It takes 12 hours for a bomber to appear into an enemy radar screen


16 posted on 02/11/2011 4:15:41 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

SIGINT. I agree


17 posted on 02/11/2011 4:16:27 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda

No. Its a waste of a Russian strategic bomber.There are very few of them still functioning. I think anyone either in the Kremlin would be put in a Russian jail for suggesting that.


19 posted on 02/25/2011 8:20:27 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson