Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TribalPrincess2U

The issue isn’t the sexual preference of some individuals who intend to attend CPAC. There is no “homosexuals not welcome” sign on the doors to the convention hall. The objection is to homosexuals forming a group and identifying themselves as such. They are not doing so because they live in fear of persecution and need to group together for protection. They are doing so in order to advance an agenda which is anti-conservative in nature. They seek not their constitutionally protected right to live as individuals and advance conservative principles, but to coerce the GOP into abandoning its defence of marriage and the military. As with the Log Cabin Republicans, this latest group’s real agenda is to embarass conservatives and insert a wedge issue into an event which should be an opportunity for unification. No conservative should support this type of factionalism with the conservative movement.


190 posted on 02/10/2011 9:09:44 AM PST by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: littleharbour; TribalPrincess2U
Good post, I agree.

Explicit support/endorsement of homosexuality has no business in a conservative movement or in the platform of a conservative party.

198 posted on 02/10/2011 9:18:44 AM PST by Notary Sojac (We have had three central banks in America's history: two of them failed and so will this one....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson