That’s why I’m criticizing the story.
How long is your attention span?
The story did not link to the study, the story simply gave some findings that sound very dubious - and I question them.
Just like Obamacare, Global Warming, Off-shore drilling, ANWAR, Toyota uncontrolled acceleration, ect.
And you throwing out the ‘projecting’ thing without an iota of effort on your part.... put the souce there to see.
Why do you think this study has any basis on fact?
Why do you believe it?
What are the conditions fo the study?
Put up some facts. I’ve presented my critique’ ... defend the story - don’t attack me. I know the DNC has a habit of attacking anyone who questions a talking point (Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, Coulter, ect) and that is EXACTLY what you are doing.
Answer the questions.... present some facts. Or are your projecting ‘Wishful thinking’?
Facts please, sources please.
You criticized the study and the conclusions that came from the study, not the story. Now that I have caught you and pointed out that you haven't even read the study, and hence can't make ANY conclusions from the available data, you retreated to the very dubious claim that you were only criticizing "the story." While you did start out with "I hate stories like this..." It is pretty obvious that your problem was with the conclusions. Without looking at the study itself, how are you in any position to make any conclusion at all? You seem to have latched onto "I DESPERATELY WANT TO BELIEVE THAT ALL TEENZ HAVE TEH SEX" and then backed that premise out to make assumptions about data that you haven't seen. Then you degenerated into projection and name calling when you got called on it. I know you like to think that you are some sort of sophisticated intellectual, but when you resort to throwing out lines like: "I know the DNC has a habit of attacking anyone who questions a talking point (Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, Coulter, ect) and that is EXACTLY what you are doing", you are anything but. Oh NOEZ... I IZ DA DNC!!! ITZ A CONSPIWACY!!!!