Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party wins: $100 billion in cuts in House GOP spending bill
The Hill ^ | February 11, 2011 | Erik Wasson

Posted on 02/11/2011 5:51:11 PM PST by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: GlockThe Vote
The real public gut check will come on the vote to increase the debt ceiling. Bush Senior folded his hand too soon. If the increase does not pass, the world will not end. Several mechanisms will allow the US to keep its credit rating, crappy as it is, and just run on less money. If the Dems would accept major reforms to create real jobs and improve health care and attack the roots of crime and security, then maybe the Repubs might kick up the ceiling. If not, read the Tea Partys lips, no increase in the debt ceiling.
The screaming and moaning will be deafening.
TWB
21 posted on 02/11/2011 6:47:28 PM PST by TWhiteBear (Jobs, Peace, Food, Security .... Down with Obama(Peacefully))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
It should be law that the government cannot spend one more dime than they receive.

$100B is a good start, but only a start. The government is too FAT and should be put on a radical diet. The Dems will scream and we will hear stories in the MSM on how the cruel the Conservatives are but our children and their children will thank us. If we do not get our house in order there will be no future for our children. If we cannot stop the Dems, Progressives and Liberals they will effectively ensure our children will have a lower standard of living and condemn them to perpetual debt and hyper inflation.

22 posted on 02/11/2011 6:51:46 PM PST by reader25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Hope they pulled the plugs on obozocare, NPR and the NEA for starters.

Pray for Egypt


23 posted on 02/11/2011 7:07:10 PM PST by bray (Vote Palin to make heads explode on both sides of the aisle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Why the leadership plans on caving, just like you it is all for show. Next time vote third party.


24 posted on 02/11/2011 7:07:58 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Face it YOU PEOPLE - you all thought that the Tea Party would cave in, once they made it to DC. Well they didn’t!!!

$100B is still a small number, but the starting point is also very small. If you rule out defense, border patrol, Social Security, Medicare, Interest on the Debt, and several other Constitutional items (like courts), there is not a whole heck of a lot left to cut from.

...and what is left to cut from will FEEL IT, because their cuts will be BIG, percentage-wise. The TEA PARTY means business - they did not come to Washington for the night life and they ARE showing that.

As to the future - the big ticket items of Social Security and Medicare are where the savings MUST come from, but it will be very tough to tell grandpa that he has to get a 32 foot Winnebego, rather than the 37 foot one that he expects to get, with the government chipping in the difference through Social Security...but that is the ONLY way to make some serious inroads into the deficit.

(p.s., we can do the Ron Paul dance and cut the military...but that just gets us back into wars as our supply lines get threatened...so it costs more in the end)


25 posted on 02/11/2011 7:15:52 PM PST by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

I hate to throw cold water on you, but $100B is peanuts. It should have been $1T for openers. I’ve said it a million times, and the offer is still open: I could balance the federal budget in one hour without a tax increase-—and I would relish every minute of it. The House Republicans are a bunch of pussies.


26 posted on 02/11/2011 7:22:27 PM PST by huckfillary (qual tyo ta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BobL

I hate to throw cold water on you, but $100B is peanuts. It should have been $1T for openers. I’ve said it a million times, and the offer is still open: I could balance the federal budget in one hour without a tax increase-—and I would relish every minute of it. The House Republicans are a bunch of pussies.


27 posted on 02/11/2011 7:22:27 PM PST by huckfillary (qual tyo ta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s only a cut if we actually spend $100 billion less this year than we did last year. I’ll believe it when I see it.

The department of agriculture has two buildings in DC. Two! Fully three quarters of that staff could be eliminated. The dept. of Veterans Affairs should be rolled back into Defense. I could go on.


28 posted on 02/11/2011 7:23:02 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Cut the Whitehouse budget to $1 and see how much waygu beef the fat-butt slob Michelle can buy.


29 posted on 02/11/2011 7:29:42 PM PST by sergeantdave (The democrat party is a seditious organization and must be outlawed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

“I hate to throw cold water on you, but $100B is peanuts. It should have been $1T for openers. I’ve said it a million times, and the offer is still open: I could balance the federal budget in one hour without a tax increase-—and I would relish every minute of it. The House Republicans are a bunch of pussies.”

I heard you the first time. Sure, I could also find $1T, but even on this site, try suggesting that Social Security be treated as a WELFARE PROGRAM, rather than what it is (theft from one generation to another than cannot even vote now...and then another that hasn’t even been born) - and see what happens to you.

So, if you take SS off, I guess take Medicare off for the same reason, take debt interest off, take most of the military spending off, where are you getting the $1T from, and be specific please, since you did make the claim.


30 posted on 02/11/2011 7:34:32 PM PST by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) on Friday evening introduced a revised 2011 government spending bill that the GOP said will cut at least $100 billion in spending this fiscal year,

I thought it was supposed to be $100 billion just for January. If we come up with an additional $100 billion in cuts each month every month for the next 12 months, our deficit will still be higher than it was the last year Republicans controlled the House.

31 posted on 02/11/2011 7:39:53 PM PST by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

As I said, give me the job. I’ll do it. Give me the job of balancing the federal budget, with no strings attached, and I will do it. And I will enjoy it. And nothing is off the table, especially Social Security. Just give me the job, I’m volunteering for it, and I want it more than anything in the world.


32 posted on 02/11/2011 7:53:14 PM PST by huckfillary (qual tyo ta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

I hear you...except that we don’t have a monarchy here. I have no doubt that you could do it, with everything fair game. But the Tea Party guys have to play in the DC world...and it’s tough just to freeze spending, much less cut it.

Also, I was reading elsewhere that the $100B cut is over the 7 months left in the fiscal year - it would be $170B cut if over 12 months, and with their limitations on what they can cut people will SCREAM!!!!!!!.

...and one other thing - $170B comes out to just about $500 dollars for every man, woman, and child. It is real money - it just looks a lot smaller, given the condition that Democrats left us in.


33 posted on 02/11/2011 7:58:59 PM PST by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They reduced the 2011 projected annual deficit from $1.5 TRILLION to $1.4 TRILLION.

This should give us several additional months before the USA collapses into a Marxist dictatorship. Thanks, Republicans.


34 posted on 02/11/2011 8:08:36 PM PST by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary
I hate to throw cold water on you, but $100B is peanuts. It should have been $1T for openers...

-----------------------------------

I agree with that

Put the federal beast back into its cage.

Epic Fail-3sm

35 posted on 02/11/2011 10:25:58 PM PST by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
a historic effort

Whoo hoo! And what would Dingy Harry know about 'meat axes'?

36 posted on 02/11/2011 11:15:54 PM PST by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson