Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki
Good points, but what if you're dead from a fire-and-forget missile 50 miles before entering the dogfight? Bigger, heavier fighters do have a hard time mixing it up with the smaller lighter ones. That's why they don't do it. They shoot at longer ranges, and if they get caught up in close, they use their big heavy engines to extend and escape.

No sane fighter pilot is intentionally going to fly into a dis-advantageous situation. Adversaries that can, will shoot from as far away as possible. Mixing it up is hard on pilots, hard (stressing) on airframes, and it only takes one mistake or lapse in concentration/judgment to lose the fight, regardless of the capabilities of your aircraft. Fighting BVR is a safer, easier bet that lets you come back and fight again tomorrow.

I'm not saying you don't need to have dogfighting capability. (witness the F-4 without a gun, oops!) But I don't think that mode of combat should be your primary tactic, nor the primary deciding factor for a modern multi-role fighter. Being a good dogfighter is nice. Being a good enough fighter to get the mission done and avoid the dogfight is even better.

5 posted on 02/11/2011 7:54:00 PM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThunderSleeps

I wonder why Dassault haven’t bothered to compare the Rafale against the Eurofighter Typhoon, which is known to have excellent maneuverability.


9 posted on 02/11/2011 8:37:03 PM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson