Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert: Pakistan building fourth plutonium reactor
Israel News ^ | Feb 10, 2011

Posted on 02/12/2011 2:12:43 PM PST by robowombat

Expert: Pakistan building fourth plutonium reactor Published: 02.10.11, 20:54 / Israel News

An independent expert says Pakistan has begun building what appears to be a fourth plutonium reactor, increasing concerns that the volatile nation is creating more nuclear material than it can safeguard.

(Excerpt) Read more at ynetnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nuclearweapons; pakistan; plutonium; reactor; wmd

1 posted on 02/12/2011 2:12:46 PM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat

How many plutonium reactors does Israel currently have? Does anyone know for sure. If any army on earth has control of it’s nuclear assets it’s Pakistan and Israel.


2 posted on 02/12/2011 2:19:30 PM PST by STD (Stock Up on Precious Metals While You Still Can)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Compliments of the American Taxpayer....sheesh!


3 posted on 02/12/2011 2:33:43 PM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

Living On US dole, Pakistan Builds Fourth Plutonium Reactor

February 10, 2011 | The Times of India

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2671612/posts

WASHINGTON: Despite being in the throes of a crippling political and economic crisis and almost entirely dependent on handouts from the United States and multilateral aid, Pakistan is poking a finger in the international community’s eye. Days after it was revealed that Islamabad has doubled its nuclear weapons’ inventory in the past decade, American experts have discovered that it has begun building a fourth plutonium-producing reactor to produce even more nuclear bombs to add to the 100-plus it already has.

The Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) announced on Wednesday that it has obtained commercial satellite imagery from January 15, 2011 that shows what appears to be a fourth reactor under construction at Pakistan’s Khushab nuclear site. The reactor construction was not visible during a previous satellite pictures last November.

“Pakistan is determined to produce considerably more plutonium for nuclear weapons,” ISIS said in an outline of the progression of the country’s plutonium reactors. While Pakistan’s initial nuclear weapons were enriched uranium-based, it expanded to plutonium-based weapons (which are more compact) with the commissioning in 1998 of the first reactor at the Khushab site, which lies southwest of Islamabad. Sometime between 2000 and 2002, Pakistan began constructing a second reactor at the site, and in 2006, it began building a third reactor, adjacent to the second Khushab reactor.

ISIS, a think-tank with expertise in nuclear proliferation, said that in commercial satellite imagery from December 2009, vapor could be seen rising from some of the second reactor’s cooling tower fan blades, indicating that the second reactor was at least at some stage of initial operation. Vapor can again be seen rising from some of the second reactor’s cooling towers in the January 15, 2011 imagery, though none can be seen yet over the third reactor’s cooling towers, while construction of the fourth has just begun.

The U.S administration, as usual, is not expected to react to the development amid mounting criticism that it is effectively funding Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program because Islamabad does not generate enough revenues on its own and lives on international dole. The country is in such bad shape that its state-owned airline PIA and its railways are now crippled by strikes and shortages. The federal cabinet resigned en masse earlier this week to pave way for a smaller ministry to save money amid growing disquiet about the profligate ways of its politicians and the military.

But none of this appears to have affected its nuclear program, that in effect are indirectly underwritten by Washington, and which in turn has made no effort to rein in the unstable country’s massing of nuclear weapons.

The Obama administration last month quietly swallowed an expert report that Pakistan had doubled its nuclear weapons stockpile to over 100, much of which happened during the Bush dispensation, and was well on its way to becoming the world’s fifth largest nuclear weapons state, overtaking France. While doing so, Pakistan has also blocked a prospective international treaty to end production of fissile material that every other nation wants to bring into force.

Analysts surmise that Pakistan is pushing the envelope because it believes it has a foot on the American jugular going into Afghanistan and also that it (Pakistan), with a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons, “is too big to fail.” But some experts are starting to question its premise.

“Giving the Pakistani government more money because it is ‘too big to fail’ is a doomed policy in every way except one: it allows us to believe (for the time being) that nuclear weapons will not fall into the hands of people who would like to detonate those weapons in Long Beach or Baltimore Harbor,” John Ellis, a U.S Consultant wrote this week. Even U.S lawmakers, who signed off on the $ 7.5 billion Kerry-Lugar aid bill, are starting to question their munificence particularly in light of the spat over jailed American national Raymond Davis.


4 posted on 02/12/2011 2:43:09 PM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

We are going to end up having to obliterate that country! The West should pull out, and give them a warning; “Anything,,, ANYTHING,, happens because of you, we’re going to kill all of you!”
Of course, Bammy would never do that.


5 posted on 02/12/2011 2:59:01 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

You get more of what you reward.


6 posted on 02/12/2011 3:00:27 PM PST by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge, MA grad student. Any potential conservative Christian FReepmail-FRiends out there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
We are going to end up having to obliterate that country!

Or those pesky control rods just get stuck ( aka the Mossad....) in the full "throttle" position.....

7 posted on 02/12/2011 3:11:52 PM PST by taildragger ((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
My guess would be the Paks figure Iran will have a nuclear capability in the not distant future and they want enough nukes to be able to independently target India and Iran. Also they are calculating (and correctly I would say) that a Shina -bomb will lead to a lot of Sunni states wanting some nuke insurance and a few nukes from Pakistan along with the delivery systems and trained staff to maintain the bombs and the delivery systems will be in high demand and make a lot of foreign exchange for that dead broke dead beat country Pakistan. There will also be great opportunities for those on the inside in Pak land to enrich themselves beyond their wildest dreams in peddling nuke insurance to the Saudis and Egypt and Iraq and Turkey and who ever else has the hard cash. Unfortunately nuclearizing the Mideast will lead to a true nightmare. If there is one place one of the players will use nukes out of desperation, craziness, or religious fervor it will be there. Also, in spite of the size of Israel's nuclear capabilities deterrence may not be enough in a region where politics and religious fanaticism frequently overlap. This will be a more serious situation than most Americas can imagine and it makes US-NATO efforts in Afghanistan more irrelevant.
8 posted on 02/12/2011 3:51:57 PM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Well stated, and I am in complete agreement.


9 posted on 02/12/2011 3:58:00 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

David Albright of the Institute for Science and International Security said Thursday that commercial satellite images show construction has begun of a building near three other plutonium reactors at Khushab, outside Islamabad. He said based on its footprint it probably is a fourth reactor.


10 posted on 02/12/2011 3:58:19 PM PST by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

32°23’30.91”N
71°27’41.79”E
Chashma Unit 1; Unit 2 near by — no sign of 3 or 4 in picture


11 posted on 02/12/2011 4:12:38 PM PST by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD

Re: How many plutonium reactors does Israel currently have? Does anyone know for sure. If any army on earth has control of it’s nuclear assets it’s Pakistan and Israel/

India may be a little concerned.


12 posted on 02/12/2011 5:50:15 PM PST by jesseam (Been there, done that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
...the $ 7.5 billion Kerry-Lugar aid bill...

I don't have to read past the title to know that bill is a piece of crap.

13 posted on 02/12/2011 6:03:35 PM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Somebody gets it. See Egypt. Not intended for you Doc. You seem well apprised of the potential for disaster in Pakistan.


14 posted on 02/13/2011 9:20:44 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson