Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mikey_1962

This is not what it appears.
What they are talking about here, if you look at the legislation is keeping everyone in a union controlled by the state. The state wants to take the dues and “invest” the money as it sees fit. Then take the proceeds and spend them as they see fit.

This is not the end of a union but a government run one that is not even remotely under the control of the people in it.

A VERY dangerous step in the wrong direction


31 posted on 02/14/2011 12:40:28 PM PST by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Munz
What they are talking about here, if you look at the legislation is keeping everyone in a union controlled by the state.

NOT TRUE. Kasich's proposal has required annual union elections. If the members want to decertify, they have the chance once a year.

BTW I live in Ohio.

35 posted on 02/17/2011 7:36:10 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson