O'Reilly claims that the birthers have no evidence that Obama is not a citizen..
I wonder...what evidence does O'Reilly have that Obama is a citizen.
There is no convincing evidence either way. Though the effort to keep the long-form out of public view is, shall we say, suspicious?
I wonder...what evidence does O'Reilly have that Obama is a citizen.
The burden of proof, clearly, is on Obama to prove that he is a citizen.
I’ve always been taught that where there is smoke there is usually fire. Considering the amount of money that Obozo has spent hiding his birth certificate and college records, I’d have to say that a rather large blaze is involved.
The Hawaii Department of Health has indirectly confirmed that Obama’s BC was amended in 2006 and is thus not legally valid. They’ve also indirectly confirmed in 2 different ways that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery.
Obama’s buddy HI Gov Neil Abercrombie told Mike Evans that there is no proof of a Hawaii birth for Obama. He told a reporter for the Star Advertiser that there’s actually something written down in the State Archive - but the only HDOH records authorized to be stored in the archive rather than the HDOH office are 75-year-old COHB’s and registrations of foreign birth.
So there actually is evidence that he has no legally-sufficient documentation to prove US citizenship by birth (much less natural born citizenship, as is required for Constitutional eligibility). And the problem with that is that he’s been using some kind of BC for his whole life long. What BC was it, if Hawaii has nothing for him?
There’s documentation for all this and a bunch more at http://www.butterdezillion.wordpress.com .