Posted on 02/16/2011 2:42:35 PM PST by Syncro
DEMOCRATS: EMBOLDENING AMERICA'S ENEMIES AND TERRIFYING HER ALLIES SINCE 1976Read more at AnnCoulter.Com
February 16, 2011
The Middle East is on fire again, and crazy Muslims with funny names aren't helping things -- Mahmoud, ElBaradei, al-Banna, Barack ...
The major new development is that NOW liberals want to get rid of a dictator in the Middle East! Where were they when we were taking out the guy with the rape rooms?
Remember? The one who had gassed his own people, invaded his neighbors and was desperately seeking weapons of mass destruction? The guy who emerged from a spider hole looking like Charlie Sheen after a three-day bender?
Liberals couldn't have been less interested in removing Saddam Hussein and building a democracy in Iraq. So it's really adorable seeing them get all choked up about democracy now. Say, as long as liberals are all gung-ho about getting rid of out-of-touch, overbearing dictators, how about we start with Janet Napolitano?
Why did they want to keep Saddam Hussein in power again? Yes, that's right -- because he didn't have stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. Their big argument was that Saddam was five long years away from developing them.
By my calculations, that means as of March 2008, Israel would have been gone and Saddam would have been in total control of the Middle East.
Thanks, liberals!
But they were shocked by Mubarak. Liberals angrily cited the high unemployment rate in Egypt as a proof that Mubarak was a beast who must step down. Did they, by any chance, see the January employment numbers for the United States? The only employment sectors showing any growth at all are medical marijuana cashiers, Hollywood sober-living coaches and "Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark" understudies filling in for maimed cast members.
Are we one jobs report away from liberals rioting in the street?
Mubarak supported U.S. policy, used his military to fight Muslim extremists and recognized Israel's right to exist. Or as the left calls it, three strikes and you're out.
Obama was so rough on the Egyptian leader, the Saudis reportedly had to ask him not to humiliate Mubarak. (You know, like Chinese President Hu did to Obama.) In fact, Mubarak may be the only despot Obama didn't bow to.
You'd think Mubarak and Obama would be natural allies. Mubarak lives in Egypt; Obama created a pyramid scheme known as ObamaCare. To win Obama's support, maybe Mubarak should have dropped the whole "president" thing and called himself "czar." Obama seems to like czars.
Or he should have announced that Egypt was going to blow $500 billion on a high-speed bullet train nobody wanted.
I lost respect for Ann when she supported Mitt Romney and attended Homocon.
Correct.
Technically it was a spelling error, not a grammaricalalistic one.
If you are going to throw a dig at me, get it rite.
Yeah I agree. She accuses an entire party of treason (which I agree with) but somehow the birther issue is crack pot.
Rite?
Spelling is a component of grammar.
Ann is an extremely excellent constitutional lawyer and very funny. My favorite. I don’t throw out pepole who disagree with me on a couple of issues when there is so much to agree on. I happen to agree with her though. Birthers are wasting their time and what is wrong with gay conservatives?
Yer so easy....
Tootie and Muldoon could teach Obama a thing or 2!
Oh and btw, my grammar lived to be 96.
I agree with your first two statements and disagree with the last two. I believe that Ann Coulter is a valuable conservative writer and while I part company with her on a few issues, she is solid on the core issues of political conservatism and a fearless slayer of leftist lies and deceptions, always done with wit and flair. She remains my favorite conservative writer/commentator. So, in essence, we agree about Ann.
recent polls show that now 72% of GOP’ers think Obama wasn’t born in America, doesn’t sound like a dead issue to me. Sounds like some of or talking heads need to get their heads out of the sand. And if she is a constitutional lawer she is in the same league as Obama then.
recent polls show that now 72% of GOP’ers think Obama wasn’t born in America, doesn’t sound like a dead issue to me. Sounds like some of or talking heads need to get their heads out of the sand. And if she is a constitutional lawyer she is in the same league as Obama then.
Ann said that if Christie isn’t our candidate we lose. I don’t trust her judgement much anymore.
Almost a centurian!
You are a phony and a hypocrite.
Get to work on your issue, or be exposed for just a guy in his basement with orange fingers.
You should have some results by now, it's pretty much a slam dunk.
I'm very dissapointed in you.
Anyone who can’t be trusted to defend the Constitution ( **ALL** of it!) can’t be trusted!
Ann can’t be trusted.
This is a stawman. I haven't seen anyone demanding that Ann spend **ALL** of her time on the birther issue. Geeze! How about **SOME** of her time?
And...The time she has spent on Obama’s very questionable eligibility she **INSULTED** those defending Article 2 Section 1, by calling them “cranks” and using the KKK to make her point against them.
Again,...If a person can't be trusted to defend the Constitution ( ALL of it!) then they can NOT be trusted!
OY! Come on - you don’t even need that issue - there are SOOOO many others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.