Perhaps Clarence will speak out on zer0’s eligibilty on March 4th. He certainly had a good chuckle about it recently.
I don’t think a lot of people would be happy with what he he will say.
Let’s say that the Federal court has a 5 to 4 decision in favor of Obama’s eligibility.
2 of them “justices” presumably on Obama’s side were appointed by Obama himself. If Obama was not eligible to be president then the court only has 7 members not 9 and thus the majority would have been the 4 that voted against Obama.
That sounds like a major constitutional crisis. One I would very much like to fight, as it would justifiably open into question the legitimacy of the Federal Employees in black robes deciding this matter.
That being said I don’t think there will be a 5 to 4 ruling on this issue. I think the Federal court will overwhelmingly side with it’s employers.(The Federal Government as now controlled by Obama) But what I would like to know how the injustices that Obama appointed treat the matter.
Do they respectfully recluse themselves knowing that depending upon the outcome they would not have a job? Or do they actually vote in a supreme display of arrogance?