Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
After pondering this development for awhile this morning, all I can say is this: at a critical moment, one that will determine if it is even possible for the people of this country to get a handle on a spiraling-out-of-control government, Sarah Palin has one foot firmly in both camps.

I strongly disagree with you. She is stating the other side without alienating or being obnoxius. Surley you don't think Chris Christie has a foot in both camps because he compliments good teachers. Taking an Ed Shultz or Michael Savage approach is not going to get anybody to the table. We need the extreme, intolerant comments, but not from the leaders who are going to have the responsibility to solve the problem.

61 posted on 02/19/2011 7:25:00 AM PST by bobzeetwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: bobzeetwin

Calling someone your “brother and sister” is a bit stronger than a “compliment,” wouldn’t you say?


63 posted on 02/19/2011 7:26:48 AM PST by EternalVigilance (If you have a foot in both camps, don't be surprised when the battle sweeps over and destroys you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: bobzeetwin
Taking an Ed Shultz or Michael Savage approach is not going to get anybody to the table.

More damage has been done to the conservative movement by a desire for a "seat at the table" than you can possibly imagine.

65 posted on 02/19/2011 7:30:01 AM PST by EternalVigilance (If you have a foot in both camps, don't be surprised when the battle sweeps over and destroys you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: bobzeetwin
"Taking an Ed Shultz or Michael Savage approach is not going to get anybody to the table."

Seat at the table? You don't get it. Walker (a governor who understands the immediacy and severity of the problem) doesn't want to give them a seat - hell, he doesn't even want them to have a table. He is, quite simply, trying to undo the collective bargaining process BECAUSE IT IS BANKRUPTING THE STATE. No public service unions, or at least, no collective bargaining for those unions.

To everyone but Palin (apparently), this isn't a negotiating. It's a dissolution. To quote Nick Nolte from "48 Hrs"...

"Now, get this! We ain't partners. We ain't brothers. And we ain't friends.
" THAT'S the message conservative leaders should be sending. Nothing more, nothing less - especially when not even a majority of DEMOCRATS believe there should be public service unions.
69 posted on 02/19/2011 7:35:07 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson