Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House votes 244-179 to kill U.S. funding of IPCC
climatesciencewatch.org ^ | Feb. 19, 2011 | Rick Piltz

Posted on 02/19/2011 9:09:19 AM PST by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: PROCON; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
War on climate science? Know-nothings? Where's the "Blow Jet-fueled Chunks" Alert?

DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

61 posted on 02/19/2011 7:10:37 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I was listening on the radio to this guy saying how air pollution was rising in my county. I was wondering how this could possibly be. He then went on to say that county CO2 emissions were rising. People who are dumb will listen to this guy and think real air pollution is rising!

Devious liberals are trying to conflate real smokestack and smog pollution with simple CO2 emissions. Same as they deceptively jumble up illegal immigrants with legal immigrants.


62 posted on 02/19/2011 7:23:21 PM PST by dennisw (- - - -He who does not economize will have to agonize - - - - - Confucius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Excellent work boys, keep at it.


63 posted on 02/19/2011 8:03:02 PM PST by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
HAH-HAH-OBAMA, Lets see some proof of your preaching about Bipartisan by example.

BTW Zero, We WON! Jackwagon..

64 posted on 02/19/2011 8:06:34 PM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Outstanding indeed!

ZOT the IPCC!

ZOT Planned Parenthood!

ZOT Obamacare!

Next, ZOT funding for the UN!!!

ZOT, BABY, ZOT!!!:)


65 posted on 02/19/2011 8:34:56 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dufekin
...so it sounds like the Republicans really ought to make further amendments to remove many more items, even for some agencies that they support some funding for. They have to start out with as many cuts as possible, but they will lose if this is a make-or-break battle. Better to delay committing to most funding until Obama truly commits to a f***ing huge bunch of cuts.
66 posted on 02/19/2011 8:36:21 PM PST by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

The GOP is grabbing headlines and probably scoring some points with the pro-growth crowd and the anti-abortion crowd, but they need to do more than just that. No rest for the weary.


67 posted on 02/19/2011 8:39:34 PM PST by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Excellent.


68 posted on 02/19/2011 9:27:52 PM PST by MonicaG (God bless our military! Praying and thanking God for you every day. Thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator

Could you please move this article back to the top of Breaking News as it is Hugh and Series...I’m series!


69 posted on 02/19/2011 10:54:11 PM PST by PROCON (Republicans: we elected you, DON'T let us down; 2011: the year of REPEAL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I just posted this:

That man-made CO2 is a primary cause of climate change is just a hypothesis. (Unproven )

*************************EXCERPTS**********************************

STATEMENT OF H. LEIGHTON STEWARD

CHAIRMAN, PLANTSNEED CO2.ORG AND CO2ISGREEN.ORG

            The statement is being made in response to statements submitted to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power, Committee on Energy and Commerce, United States House of Representatives, February 9, 2011 by EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson and American Public Health Association representative Lynn Goldman, M.D.

 

            Administrator Jackson begins by stating that all Americans rely on the Clean Air Act to protect them from harmful air pollution.  I agree. Next, Administrator Jackson says she is relying on the 2007 Supreme Court decision that EPA could consider greenhouse gases an air pollutant.  Administrator Jackson neglected to include that the Supreme Court also said the Administrator could exclude a greenhouse gas if she could present evidence that the gas was not a pollutant or endangerment to mankind. 

This gets to the heart of the issue since Administrator Jackson has singled out carbon dioxide as the key substance to regulate on the grounds that, as Administrator Jackson so frequently comments, "CO2 is a pollutant and an endangerment to mankind." 

That anyone would say that CO2 is a pollutant is incredible, but particularly when said by Administrator Jackson who is a degreed chemical engineer. 

There is not a single case, short of multi-thousands of parts per million (ppm) of this trace gas, that indicates CO2 to be a pollutant.

  CO2 is the staff of life.  Earth's food chain begins with plants and as we all learned in elementary school, CO2 is what plants eat.  In fact, as thousands of peer reviewed laboratory and field studies show, the more CO2 plants "eat", the more robustly they grow. 

This is not speculation based upon man-made models; this is from real, empirical observations.  I present three examples demonstrating that CO2 is not a pollutant; first, many commercial greenhouse operators grow the fruits and vegetables we buy in the grocery and where they and their staffs work, in an atmosphere of 1,000 ppm CO2.  The workers suffer no ill effects and the plants grow profusely. 

Earth's current atmosphere contains only 390 ppm.  Secondly, as testified to the Unites States Senate, Princeton distinguished Professor William Happer has pointed that our very own government allows CO2 levels to build up to 8,000 ppm in our nuclear submarines where our sailors reside for week s at a time.  Thirdly, we breathe in the current 390 ppm of CO2 and breathe out 40,000 ppm (!) with our lungs incurring no toxic or detrimental effects. 

For this Administration and especially Administrator Jackson to continue to refer to CO2 as a pollutant is far worse that a slip of the tongue or exaggeration; it is grossly misleading to our country's citizens.

70 posted on 02/20/2011 1:33:40 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And for anyone who missed it....

Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995

71 posted on 02/20/2011 1:35:11 PM PST by mewzilla (Hey, Schumer, your Lockerbie report left quite a bit out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson