Posted on 02/21/2011 6:23:37 AM PST by SJackson
Up until now, the Egyptian revolution generally, and the Brotherhood in particular, has lacked a charismatic thinker, someone who could really mobilize the masses. Qaradawi is that man. Talkbacks (3) Friday, February 18 may be a turning point in Egyptian history. On that day Yusuf al-Qaradawi spoke to a giant cheering crowd in Tahrir Square.
He praised the army – to ward off it’s repression and to encourage it to support a transformation of the country.
He preached caution and patience, working with the army.
And he also lavished praise on the pro-Islamist chairman of the committee to write the new constitution, which may not be a good sign at all.
There is one easily missed word in his speech that is the most significant. That word is “hypocrites.” In the Islamist lexicon, hypocrites means Muslims who do not practice “true” Islam according to the radicals. To take Egypt out of the hands of “hypocrites” is to put it onto the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood – or at least similarly minded people – which, contrary to the best and the brightest policy makers, intelligence analysts, experts and journalists, is not a moderate organization.
History may show that while president Jimmy Carter may have “lost” Iran, one of his successors may have helped give away Egypt. Is that alarmist? I hope so.
Watch and see.
As so often happens, Israel will be left to pay the bill.
Qaradawi said he looked forward to a similar ceremony in Jerusalem, and he did not mean after a two-state negotiated solution.
IT WAS 32 years ago almost to the day when Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini returned in triumph to Tehran to take over the leadership of that country. Qaradawi has a tougher job, but he’s up to the challenge if his health holds up.
Up until now, the Egyptian revolution generally, and the Brotherhood in particular, has lacked a charismatic thinker, someone who could really mobilize the masses. Qaradawi is that man. Long resident in the Gulf, he is returning to his homeland in triumph.
Through Internet, radio, his 100 books and his weekly satellite television program, he has been an articulate voice for revolutionary Islamism. He is literally a living legend.
Under the old regime, Qaradawi had been banned from the country. He is now 84 – two years older than the fallen president Hosni Mubarak – but tremendously energetic and clear-minded.
It was Qaradawi who, in critiquing Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida, argued that Islamists should always participate in elections because they would invariably win them. Hamas and Hezbollah have shown that he was right.
Symbolically, he gave the Friday prayer/sermon in Tahrir Square, the center of the revolutionary movement.
The massing of hundreds of thousands in the square to hear a sermon by a radical Islamist is not the kind of thing that’s been going on under the 60-year-old military regime that was recently overthrown.
The context is also the thanking of Qaradawi for his support of the revolution – an implication that he is somehow its spiritual father.
Though some in the West view him as a moderate, Qaradawi supports the straight Islamist line: anti-American, anti-Western, wipe Israel off the map, foment jihad, stone homosexuals....in short, the works.
One of his initiatives has been urging Muslims to settle in the West, of which he said, “that powerful West, which has come to rule the world, should not be left to the influence of the Jews alone.”
He contends that the three major threats Muslims face are Zionism, internal integration and globalization. To survive, he argues, Muslims must fight the Zionists, Crusaders, idolators and communists.
Make no mistake, Qaradawi is not some fossilized Islamic ideologue. He is brilliant and innovative, tactically flexible and strategically sophisticated. He is subtle enough to sell himself as a moderate to those who don’t understand the implications of his words or able to look beneath the surface of his presentation.
What is his view of both the Mubarak regime and the young, Facebook-flourishing liberals who made the revolution? As he said in 2004: “Some Arab and Muslim secularists are following the US government by advocating the kind of reform that will disarm the nation from the elements of strength that are holding our people together.”
There is no doubt. Qaradawi, not bin Laden, is the most dangerous revolutionary Islamist in the world, and he is about to unleash the full force of his persuasion on Egypt.
Who are you going to bet on being more influential, a Google executive and an unorganized band of well-intentioned liberal Egyptians, or the world champion radical Islamist cleric?
The writer is director of the Global Research in International Affairs Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs Journal. He blogs at www.rubinreports.blogspot.com. A shorter version of this article was published in American Thinker.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Americans who are overjoyed at the riots in the mideast see this as good thing. They think they will soon see American style “democracy” spread through the muslim states.
They are in for a rude and painful awakening.
The people with power and resurces who are behind these uprisings don’t want western style democracy - they want Saria law and a new Islamic Caliphate.
This will not end well.
Is it sarcasm?
Dude, we ain’t getting rid of anything. The High has become fat and scared, and the middle rises up to become the high. There’s nothing new about any of this.
As long as Islam is a big part of these cultures, there will not be your type of democracy. Egyptians wanted the secular out and the islam in. Its their choice.
It takes more than a week of street protests. It will take protracted, bloody civil wars. Iraq, which was “ripe for liberation,” took years of blood letting. In Egypt, there is an entrenched ruling class holding the keys to the armories. They won't go quietly. “Moderates” and “democrats” don't have a history winning such contests.
I have liberal pals , teachers all over the nation, and of course the MSM who think that the ‘so called democratic protesters’ are just like those in Wisc. It would be silly and funny if it were not so wrongheaded. So, the Islamofascist has risen his head. In Wisc. , it is the NEA-SEIU and the leftists who want to’ transform ‘ society. We have heard and had enough of those sentiments from the socialist in the WH.
Don’t delude yourself about this. This is the real agenda. Check this video out:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2677527/posts
“Make no mistake, Qaradawi is not some fossilized Islamic ideologue. He is brilliant and innovative, tactically flexible and strategically sophisticated. He is subtle enough to sell himself as a moderate to those who don’t understand the implications of his words or able to look beneath the surface of his presentation.”
If so, then he is a VERY dangerous individual that needs to be eliminated with extreme prejudice.
“Make no mistake, Qaradawi is not some fossilized Islamic ideologue. He is brilliant and innovative, tactically flexible and strategically sophisticated. He is subtle enough to sell himself as a moderate to those who don’t understand the implications of his words or able to look beneath the surface of his presentation.”
If so, then he is a VERY dangerous individual that needs to be eliminated with extreme prejudice.
All revolutions are hijacked. kerensky paved the way for Lenin who paved the way for Stalin.
LOL -you are foolishly optimistic or a leftist... All leftists are but collectivist mob rule advocates -another name for democracy -another name for unions.
Thank God we are a Republic under God!
It is the culture and system that denies unalienable individual rights that 'allows' tyranny to take hold -not the tyrant. The tyrant simply rises to the occasion where he can rise. We simply see one tyrant replaced with another here UNLESS and UNTIL those darn Judeo-Christian principles take hold. You know -those darn principles that leftists constantly wish to eradicate from public discourse -those ones there yup. The ones that Islam and secular alike do not consider unalienable...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.