Skip to comments.
Some activists want wealthy (California RAT quitter) Jane Harman to pay for special election vote
The Hill ^
| 2/21/11
| Sean J. Miller
Posted on 02/21/2011 6:39:17 PM PST by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Her departure only two months into her new term
That didn't take long. Poor planning on her part?
To: Libloather
Good luck to them....Getting a rich Democrat to pay for something THEMSELVES...You’d have better luck asking the First Wookie to skip a meal! LOL
To: Libloather
"Poor planning on her part?" Hardly.
Harman's your typical Elite opportunist...
To: jakerobins
So she’s decided to “cross the aisle” and go to work for a (neo)conservative organization? How bipartisan of her.
4
posted on
02/21/2011 6:48:20 PM PST
by
ruination
To: Libloather
Why bother with an election, just put the next commie in by acclamation..
5
posted on
02/21/2011 6:49:55 PM PST
by
Fred
(Suspend All Immigration Until Unemployment is Reduced to 5%)
To: Libloather
Wait—Harmon is RICH? I thought only Republicans were rich and that the Rats were all “of the people”.
To: Charlemagne on the Fox
7
posted on
02/21/2011 7:00:54 PM PST
by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afghanistan and Iraq))
To: Libloather
Not a single Democrat incumbent lost last Nov.
Not even the dead one.
I’m not kidding.
8
posted on
02/21/2011 7:01:36 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
(Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
To: Libloather
It's undoubtedly something really simple ~ like her husband couldn't get a security clearance so she could stay on the Intelligence committee.
That started when he bought Newsweek for $1. He got a lot of security problems with that purchase.
9
posted on
02/21/2011 7:11:45 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Tzimisce
Not a single Democrat incumbent lost last Nov. Not even the dead one. I’m not kidding.In 2010, a dozen Dems did not run for re-election - their seats went to the GOP. My guess is that these pols decided to jump before they were pushed - why wait until you get laid off before looking for a job?
10
posted on
02/21/2011 7:38:58 PM PST
by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
To: Libloather
Jane, you ignorant slut...
11
posted on
02/21/2011 8:07:34 PM PST
by
khnyny
(What exactly is a CDO??)
To: ruination
If you know anything about Harman you know she’s long been targeted as “too far right” for the Democratic party. Her district used to be Republican and had a lot of defense contractors but that industry is dead and the district’s makeup has changed. Whoever ultimately replaces Harman will be LEFT of center and certainly left of her.
To: newzjunkey
Indeed, her district could be fairly characterized as a gaggle of anti-American dirtbags.
To: newzjunkey
If you know anything about Harman you know she’s long been targeted as “too far right” for the Democratic party. I do know, as I have followed most of her career and I live in her district. I recall Queen Nancy deprived Harman of a committee chair position that was rightfully hers recently. Bad blood between the women.
14
posted on
02/22/2011 3:40:41 PM PST
by
La Enchiladita
(Remember, Reflect, Renew: 2011, 10 years since 9/11. Never Forget.)
To: Tzimisce
53 incumbent Democrat Congressman lost their seats in the Novemeber 2010 election.
I'm not kidding.
To: Mr. Lucky
53 incumbent Democrat Congressman lost their seats in the Novemeber 2010 election.
I'm not kidding.
Are you talking state Congressmen? I don't believe that - if it was true, California would have a Republican House.
Are you talking Federal? I don't believe that either.
Are you talking primary fights? Because I wasn't talking about primaries.
What is your source? REAL source. Not DailyKos.
16
posted on
02/22/2011 5:56:38 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
(Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
To: Tzimisce
Dude, try a little civility and then, maybe, google on something to the effect of “United States House of Representative Elections, 2010”.
To: Mr. Lucky
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_2010
Yes - it is true, 54 incumbent Democrats were defeated.
But not a single one of them was from California.
Do me a favor, try actually paying attention to what is being said before you start spouting off please.
18
posted on
02/23/2011 8:51:59 AM PST
by
Tzimisce
(Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
To: Tzimisce
Umm, young man, you'll recall that you were the one making bizarre claims that no incumbant lost a congressional election in 2010, and that you continued to make that claim even after it was pointed out you were wrong.
That you've now changed that claim to apply only to the US Congressional delegation from the State of California is an apology which I will accept.
To: Tzimisce
Umm, young man, you'll recall that you were the one making bizarre claims that no incumbant lost a congressional election in 2010, and that you continued to make that claim even after it was pointed out you were wrong.
That you've now changed that claim to apply only to the US Congressional delegation from the State of California is an apology which I will accept.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson