[TSgt]

Your deflection is noted.

I’ve provided several similar examples where the parents were charged. You choose to selectively ignore them.

Do you wear your boots to the grocery store?

[freedomwarrior998]

Actually, you were the one deflecting. I asked you to point out how this incident met the elements of the Indiana Criminal Code. You responded by posting a bunch of irrelevant stories.

The only relevant response that you can make, is to point out the specific facts (which you claim to know) that show that THIS CASE meets the elements of the code.

And you need to be specific in regards to the Mens Rea.

So far, you have been unable to do so... and you have done nothing but respond with Ad Hominem tactics and deflection.

So again... How does this incident meet the elements of the offenses that I posted? Be specific.

[freedomwarrior998]

http://www.fox41.com/story/12143753/no-charges-in-bb-gun-death?clienttype=printable

http://www.theindychannel.com/news/22235273/detail.html

http://www.wlfi.com/dpp/news/crime/no-criminal-charges-in-lafayette-child-drowning

http://www.witn.com/carteretcounty/headlines/98050104.html

http://www.dailylocal.com/articles/2010/08/17/news/police/doc4c6a7d999c0ee553910334.txt?viewmode=2

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=12&articleid=20081230_12_0_CHANDL569100&allcom=1

EPIC FAILURE.