To: RobertClark
Already-vested benefits cannot be touched Unreasonably vested should be touched. Why should someone who paid 6-7% of a salary get that final year salary for 20+ years. THEY NEVER COULD HAVE SAVED THAT MUCH! The guaranteed returns are ridiculous. The paid funds should be pro-rated versus what was paid in versus SSI. SSI should be the only government pension!!!
2 posted on
02/22/2011 6:13:11 PM PST by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: King Moonracer
BTW, not everybody who accrues vesting gets delivery of the pension. That's because people die. The actuarial analysis behind any pension plan assumes the same.
The individual plans assume that even if you die your relatives get some. That's not true with these group pension plans.
8 posted on
02/22/2011 6:33:21 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: King Moonracer
Unreasonably vested should be touched. Why should someone who paid 6-7% of a salary get that final year salary for 20+ years. THEY NEVER COULD HAVE SAVED THAT MUCH! The guaranteed returns are ridiculous. The paid funds should be pro-rated versus what was paid in versus SSI. SSI should be the only government pension!!! Ask pilots of bankrupt airlines that defaulted on pension funds. Retired and retiring public employees should indeed be vulnerable to pension adjustments when the jurisdiction was bankrupted by wastefulness masquerading as merit and generosity. Give them the same ratio that the PBGC gave the pilots.
9 posted on
02/22/2011 6:58:06 PM PST by
jimfree
(In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson