Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victory Alert: Property Rights Amendment Passes VA Senate!
Family Foundation ^

Posted on 02/23/2011 6:12:43 AM PST by Gopher Broke

Victoria Cobb, President Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Victory Alert: Property Rights Amendment Passes Senate!

This afternoon, the Virginia Senate passed by a 35-5 vote a proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution that would protect private property rights and curb the government’s power of eminent domain. After four years of trying to pass this important legislation, with twists and turns, near-deaths, deaths, resurrections, and last minute defeats in previous General Assembly sessions, today's vote was deceptively overwhelming yet historic in importance.

Now the resolution, HJ 693, goes back to the House of Delegates since it was changed from the version that passed that chamber. Acceptance of the Senate version is almost a certainty, with House members openly eager and excited about the opportunity to vote on something given little chance in the Senate when session started.

After days of back and forth negotiations between several legislators and groups, amendments offered today were accepted by the full Senate, which led to its overwhelming victory. Liberty and limited government won today! Amazingly, the first vote on the legislation received 31 “yeas,” but when the vote was reconsidered, even more Senators saw the bill had overwhelming support and jumped on the bandwagon. Some had voted against nearly every other bill to protect our property rights.

Never underestimate the influence of an election year.

Next steps: The resolution must be passed again by the new General Assembly next year — with no changes. That done, it will go to Virginians to ratify at the polls in November 2012.

There are several legislators who worked to get this done and we can't possibly list them all. However, we cannot go any further without a bit of thanks — a bit, only, because it is impossible to adequately thank him — to the resolution’s patron, Delegate Johnny Joannou (D-79, Portsmouth). Without his determination, legislative skills and persuasive public oratory, we would very likely have to wait another three years for property rights protection. Other key leaders on this issue include Senator Mark Obenshain (R-26, Harrisonburg) and Delegate Rob Bell (R-58, Charlottesville). Each of these legislators has fought for property rights protections for years.

Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli and Senator Steve Newman (R-23, Lynchburg) also were key to the negotiations on this bill, and to its ultimate success.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: cuccinelli; news; privateproperty; property; propertyrights; statesrights; va; virginia

1 posted on 02/23/2011 6:12:48 AM PST by Gopher Broke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

Attorney General Cuccinelli statement on passage of property rights amendment in the Virginia Senate

http://www.vaag.com/PRESS_RELEASES/Cuccinelli/022211_Property_Rights.html


2 posted on 02/23/2011 6:15:56 AM PST by Gopher Broke (Repeal Obamacare !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

Got any room down there for one more?


3 posted on 02/23/2011 6:16:45 AM PST by Celtic Cross (Looking to escape to Idaho--Will work for keep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

Text and amendments here...

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=111&typ=bil&val=HJ693


4 posted on 02/23/2011 6:19:24 AM PST by deks ("...the battle of our time is the battle of liberty against the overreach of the federal government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

From his statement, it looks like government can still take your property...just as long as its not to build condos for someone else. If they need your home and land for a school or power plant-this bill makes sure the government can still take it.


5 posted on 02/23/2011 6:22:33 AM PST by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

God Bless the Old Dominion!!


6 posted on 02/23/2011 6:23:10 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
If they need your home and land for a school or power plant-this bill makes sure the government can still take it.

But a whole lot better than having it taken by a private interest. This protects property owners from Kelo-type seizures.

7 posted on 02/23/2011 6:25:10 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Agreed. A good first step.


8 posted on 02/23/2011 6:26:55 AM PST by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

“Deceptively overwhelming”? [scratches head...]

Colonel, USAFR


9 posted on 02/23/2011 6:31:52 AM PST by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

About time!


10 posted on 02/23/2011 7:07:42 AM PST by thoughtleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke

sfl


11 posted on 02/23/2011 8:14:30 AM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deks

Is this the final Senate text?

“That the General Assembly shall pass no law whereby private property, the right to which is fundamental, shall be damaged or taken except for public use. No private property shall be damaged or taken for public use without just compensation to the owner thereof. No more private property may be taken than necessary to achieve the stated public use. Just compensation shall be no less than the value of the property taken, business goodwill and access lost, damages to the residue caused by the taking, and damages to adjacent property caused by the taking. A public service company, public service corporation, or railroad exercises the power of eminent domain for public use when such exercise is for the authorized provision of utility, common carrier, or railroad services. In all other cases, a taking or damaging of private property is not for public use if the primary use is for private gain, private benefit, private enterprise, increasing jobs, increasing tax revenue, or economic development, except for the elimination of a public nuisance existing on the property. The condemnor bears the burden of proving that the use is public, without a presumption that it is.”


12 posted on 02/23/2011 8:28:11 AM PST by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: patton

I don’t think that’s the final text as it doesn’t seem to have the Senate amendments that are referred to on the page linked in Reply #4 as “Senate amendments engrossed” (which I believe means accepted).

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?111+amd+HJ693ASE

The link in Reply #4 may be updated soon with the final text that has been adopted by the House....

02/23/11 House: Senate substitute with amendments agreed to by House

02/23/11 House: VOTE: ADOPTION (83-Y 15-N)

The House roll call is here (I notice that Eileen Filler-Corn, one of Fairfax County’s Democrat delegates voted against it)...

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?111+vot+HV1355+HJ0693


13 posted on 02/23/2011 4:12:25 PM PST by deks ("...the battle of our time is the battle of liberty against the overreach of the federal government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke; deks

Y’know, if somebody wants to laud an amendment to the VA constitution, and ask me to vote for it, THEY SHOULD PRINT THE FINAL TEXT IN THE DANG ARTICLE.

And yes, I am shouting. Darn crappy reporting.

“Yeah - we won! Don’t ask what, just vote for it!”

Um, no. Our VA constitution is sacrosanct - if you want to amend it, you better publish why, and with what.

Not this junk press release.


14 posted on 02/23/2011 9:14:15 PM PST by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gopher Broke; patton

HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 693
Proposing an amendment to Section 11 of Article I of the Constitution of Virginia, relating to taking or damaging of private property.

03/03/11 House: Enrolled
03/03/11 House: Bill text as passed House and Senate (HJ693ER)
03/03/11 House: Signed by Speaker
03/04/11 Senate: Signed by President
Full text:
03/03/11 House: Bill text as passed House and Senate (HJ693ER) pdf

(language to be added is in italics...language to be removed has a line through it)

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?111+ful+HJ693ER+pdf

Next steps: The resolution must be passed again by the new General Assembly next year — with no changes. That done, it will go to Virginians to ratify at the polls in November 2012.


15 posted on 03/10/2011 2:15:53 AM PST by deks ("...the battle of our time is the battle of liberty against the overreach of the federal government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson