Posted on 02/23/2011 7:29:31 AM PST by bigbob
As Americans, were often taught that trusts and monopolies are the product of big business and are bad. However, if trusts and monopolies are bad when Big Business engages in monopolistic ways, why isnt it bad when Big Labor engages in the same sort of behaviors that are condemned when committed by Big Business?
For over a week now, the nation has watched tens of thousands march in protest to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walkers budget plan. Democrat lawmakers (aka Fleebaggers) have fled the state in order to avoid doing their duty, while Obamas OFA has bussed in the astroturf from out of state. While the union meme has been that Walkers plan is union-busting, perhaps a more apt description would be trust-busting.
One of the most vocal opponents of Scott Walkers budget plan has been the Wisconsin Education Association Council [WEAC]. As a union affiliated with the NEA, WEAC (according to its website) represents 98,000 educators in the State of Wisconsin.
Like any union, WEAC has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo when it comes to forced dues from Wisconsin school teachers, as well as automatic dues deduction from teachers paychecksboth of which would be eliminated under Walkers proposal.
Employers will be prohibited from collecting union dues and members of collective bargaining units will not be required to pay dues.
In essence, Walkers proposal threatens the life blood of the WEAC which, according to its most recent financial report on file (FY 2009), raked in over $25 million from teachers in a one year period.
Another threat to WEAC, which no one in the mainstream media is talking about is the threat to the unions insurance trust, called WEA Trust. The WEA Trust is, in essence, a union-run multi-employer health insurance trust (the employers, in this case, are school districts).
The way it works is that WEAC has, through collective bargaining (negotiations), convinced school districts to pay into the WEA Trust and, in turn, the WEA Trust is responsible for administering teachers benefits. According to PublicSchoolSpending.com, Walkers proposal would give school boards the ability to shop freely for more competitive insurance rates and save the state millions.
Last year, the Education Action Group issued a report which stated, among other things, that:
WEA Trust, an insurance company established and closely associated with the Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC), siphons millions of crucial dollars from K-12 schools and their students every year.
WEA Trust has grown very fat on public school dollars, with a net worth of $316 million and a team of 12 administrators all receiving compensation packages worth six figures per year.
Sadly, this insurance swindle is endorsed by state law.
The groups Communications Director, Steve Gunn, explains:
The pressure derives from state law, which makes the identity of a schools health insurance carrier a topic of collective bargaining between local unions and school boards. That allows union representatives to come to the table demanding expensive WEA Trust coverage, and frequently school boards give in.
[snip]
Once school districts sign up for WEA Trust coverage, and write the carrier into collective bargaining agreements, the shackles are on. And they arent easily removed.
Local unions often refuse to have the provision stricken from school labor contracts in subsequent negotiations. If a school board presses the issue in an effort to save money, WEAC will frequently take the case to arbitration.
The Trusts business practices also complicate the problem.
Districts need employee claim histories to provide to potential bidders, but WEA Trust sometimes refuses to surrender the information, making it more difficult, if not impossible, for competitors to draft an accurate insurance estimate.
WEA Trust also reportedly threatens districts with higher premiums by removing them from regional insurance pools with lower rates if they consider a cheaper carrier.
Some districts have managed to break WEA Trusts shackles and the savings tell the story. Officials from 15 districts recently told EAG that they saved six figures the first year under new coverage, while still providing quality health benefits for employees. They also say the cost of their new coverage has remained steady in subsequent years.
But there is a catch. Officials at all of the breakaway districts said they had to surrender, or at least share, the insurance savings with their local unions, generally in the form of salary increases. That left them with little or no extra revenue to cover other costs.
In other words, WEAC, the union that has been most vocal during the last weeks protests has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. If the union can defeat Scott Walkers reform plans, not only does it keep the union dues of teachers, it also gets to keep its health insurance monopoly intact.
Of course, youre not hearing this in the press as it doesnt fit the convenient narrative of class warfare. So, the next time you have someone tell you how mean Scott Walker is for attacking the teachers union, you can simply reply: Follow the money.
Here's another dirty little secret: WEAC also collects dues from mambers who wish to support their WEAC-PAC, which funds political campaigns of those who support WEAC, like the FLEE PARTY members who are now hiding out in Illinois.
I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes. Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776
Fleebaggers
FLEE Party
LOL!
If these “educators” really cared about educating our youth, they would fight to turn the curriculum upside down so the kids might actually LEARN something instead of dumbing them down to make it easier for themselves and the elite.
Isn't Big Labor just a Big Business itself?
Labor Unions are privately run operations, aren't they?
It would be interesting to see how California operates also. Then go state by state and publicize it. Teachers want all their benefits payed for by the general public. It’s got to end. Teachers should pay what the average public pays for benefits.
I would love it if someone in the US House would pass a law to ensure that States who make promises fund them or loose all federal dollars.
This would force even the must blue of blue states to come clean with their unions. They spent the union’s money years ago and the Democrats have no intention of paying it back.
Example, IL — Hasn’t made a union pension payment for 10 years.
Democrats - Thieves (politicians), Thugs (unions), Thralls and Thickheads.
All these union benefit funds and trusts, all over the nation, fit in quite well with a strategy of overwhelming the finances of government at all levels: municipal, state and federal.
It will be so nice when teachers themselves can de-fund the NEA. This is why the collective bargaining issue is so important.
Very interesting article.
Isn’t the WEA Trust being a part of Union ownership & involved in Union contract negeotiations a thinly veiled type of extortion?
I don’t think this is anywhere near an ‘arm’s length transaction’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.