What's good for Goldman Sachs must be good for America.
To: mewykwistmas
2 posted on
02/24/2011 9:10:10 AM PST by
SkyPilot
To: mewykwistmas
Didn’t Goldman Sachs benefit from TARP and Porkulus, to the tune of tens of billions, straight to their bottom line?
3 posted on
02/24/2011 9:10:43 AM PST by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: mewykwistmas
Perhaps G-S will return those BILLIONS they and their confederates stole from the treasury. (Pregnant pause here...) ROFLMAO!!!
To: mewykwistmas
Perhaps the headline should instead read: “Recipients of Vast Amounts of Government Largess Insist Even More Largess To Them Is Good For Country, and Failure To Continue To Give Them More Largess Would Result In Doom and Disaster”.
I think that about covers it.
To: mewykwistmas
Perhaps G-S will return those BILLIONS they and their confederates at the Treasury stole from the Treasury. (Pregnant pause here...) ROFLMAO!!!
To: mewykwistmas
I guess this band of thieves was hoping for another golden parachute from their paid lackey in the White Hut, and last year’s election made that unlikely SINCE WE ARE BROKE.
To: mewykwistmas
There was an article in TIME recently profiling the top money managers at Morgan Stanley and Goldman and their differing views on the US economy.
Bottom line...he Morgan Stanley manager's position is that debt is NOT good for the economy and it needs to come down. The Goldman individual's position is that debt IS good for the economy and we need to maintain debt levels.
Very interesting. I'm happy with the shares I own in Morgan.
To: mewykwistmas
10 posted on
02/24/2011 9:31:10 AM PST by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: mewykwistmas
Goldman-Sachs is in bed with the Dem political leadership as they loot the US Treasury together.
11 posted on
02/24/2011 9:31:42 AM PST by
expatpat
To: mewykwistmas
12 posted on
02/24/2011 9:32:25 AM PST by
FromLori
(FromLori">)
To: mewykwistmas
Why not just increase spending by $500 Trillion dollars if spending helps the economy so much. Just think of the growth then!
13 posted on
02/24/2011 9:35:48 AM PST by
Codeflier
(Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
To: mewykwistmas
So, why not spend $61 Billion more and get our GDP growth to 5%? How about spending $610 Billion and get the GDP skyrocket? Hmmmm...we tried even worse with “Stimulus”.
To: mewykwistmas
Goldman Sachs scumbags, former and present, have their filthy, bloody fingerprints all over the financial crash, the bailouts and the Obama Stimulus.
They have taxpayer money in their pockets and in their offshore bank accounts.
If they are against something, anything, you can bet it is good for America.
15 posted on
02/24/2011 9:47:31 AM PST by
Iron Munro
("Our country's founders cherished liberty, not democracy." -- Ron Paul)
To: mewykwistmas
House spending cuts hurt US growth Goldman Sachs bottom line.
18 posted on
02/24/2011 9:52:42 AM PST by
smokingfrog
( BORN free - taxed to DEATH (and beyond) ...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson