Replies

Like any good boogieman, he is as rich and powerful as you imagination allows. And every time one of you pokes at the ashes or intones the name “Non Sequitur” he grows fiercer.

rockrr, why would someone that holds himself out as conservative (like yourself,) want someone that is at worse (Left of Obama,) and at best Michael Bloomberg in person posting here?

We all know about your liberal tendencies, but I doubt even you believe as he did that for our service male/females should share sleeping quarters with a queeny or pierced nose bull dike on a submarine. I'm probably wrong here, since you celebrated the end of (DADT).....

The larger question is (and should be) why your obsession with a poster who no longer belongs to FreeRepublic? Here's a newsflash for you: Non Sequitur was banned. Why your preoccupation with picking at his bones?

rockrr, why would someone that holds himself out as conservative (like yourself,) want someone that is at worse (Left of Obama,) and at best Michael Bloomberg in person posting here?

Since you asked....your characterization of him is as blatantly dishonest now as it ever was. Non Sequitur was easily twice the conservative that you will ever be. As a matter of fact, I've never seen an expression of conservationism coming from you. You would do well to tend to your own fences first.

Here's another newsflash: libertarianism isn't conservatism. They may look similar ("limited government""lower taxes") but they're not the same. You are (at best) a liberaltarian.

Another day, another idabilly slander. In this one you managed to slam me and NS in the same sentence. Bravo. Also utter bravo Sierra. NS never said or implied any such thing and you know it. And you are a liar to state that I ever supported the repeal of DADT. Even a cursory review of my post demonstrates your disingenuity.

The fact that you conflate where I live with assumed "liberal tendencies" shows the limited depth of thought that you bring to the table.

No wonder no one takes you seriously.