I don’t know what to tell you.
Has immigration from Mexico made California more or less liberal? What about Colorado? More or less liberal?
New Mexico? More or less liberal? Texas? More or less liberal? California is the biggest beneficiary of these conservative values.
Was California more conservative when Ronald Reagan was Governor and before the IRCA amnesty? Was it a better place to live back then?
Certainly, with all the immigration that the Golden State has received, it should be more conservative, right? Los Angeles should be one of the most conservative cities in America.
Those “non-Anglos” don’t become more American than the “Anglos” they are replacing. On the contrary, California and other states become more like Mexico and more inclined to support the Democratic Party.
Just recently, the Mayor of Los Angeles made a request to build an eight foot wall around his mansion. Welcome to Mexifornia.
Those “Anglos” are the people in the South and West who are the base of the most reliable conservative, Republican leaning constituency in the nation.
To the extent the South and West become less Anglo, and more Hispanic, it means that the Democratic Party becomes stronger, which is precisely why that leftists and Democrats are 100 percent in the tank for amnesty and displacing the native population.
Don't blame me, that's something one their past Presidente's said.
Forget about trying to talk sense to Antoninus and Swedeboy2; they've been all over this thread babbling about how wonderful the new Mestizo nation will be, once the vile and evil Americans are pushed out.
Every nation has its traitors.