Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
In Roe v Wade, SCOTUS specifically avoided making a determination when life begins. I always thought this was a loophole for the states. I'm waiting for a state to have the cajones to pass legislation saying life begins at conception.
4 posted on 02/26/2011 8:41:25 AM PST by stylin19a ("Marine Sniper - You can run, but you'll just die tired!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a
In Roe v Wade, SCOTUS specifically avoided making a determination when life begins. I always thought this was a loophole for the states. I'm waiting for a state to have the cajones to pass legislation saying life begins at conception.

IIRC there have been states that have done this.

Amusingly (if anything related to abortion can be described as "amusing"), in one state that I remember offhand the law of unintended consequences came into play. There were all sorts of 15 and 20 year-olds filing suit to be able to drive and drink alcohol (respectively) based on their lives having begun 9 months before they were born. I think there were even Medicare-related suits based on the same principle.
22 posted on 02/26/2011 11:12:09 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson