I think read recently that the property seized in “Kelo” years ago has not been “improved upon” by the beneficiary of the court decision for it’s “public purpose” of increasing tax revenues. Does anyone here know any more about that?
“I think [I] read recently that the property seized in “Kelo” years ago has not been “improved upon” by the beneficiary of the court decision for it’s “public purpose” of increasing tax revenues.”
It has not.
“Does anyone here know any more about that?”
You do know there’s this “thing” called the “internet”... that you’re on right now as a matter of “fact”... that contains “repositories” for “information” such as this for personal discovery of information, right? “Google” is a good start.
(Why are we using so many “quotation marks”?)