Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hawk720

The Chinese are going to get pretty good at FOIA requests, particularly for filings with the patent office and regulatory agencies.


2 posted on 03/01/2011 8:53:19 AM PST by henkster (Before we make any more "investments" we ought to be shown the prospectus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: henkster
Maybe so, but there's a very clear point under the law that the appeals court (whose ruling was overturned in this decision) apparently overlooked.

"The protection in FOIA against disclosure of law enforcement information on the ground that it would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy does not extend to corporations," Roberts wrote. "We trust that AT&T will not take it personally."

Justice Roberts is absolutely right about this. If a corporation that deals with a public agency wants to make a legal case that some of its information should not be subject to public scrutiny under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), it must demonstrate that the disclosure of the information would cause irreparable harm or monetary damages. The mere fact that they deem it "private" isn't good enough, for the simple reason that the corporation isn't subject to any kind of legal protection for personal privacy as a matter of course.

4 posted on 03/01/2011 9:31:23 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson