[Huck]

Bachmann says the mandate should only stay in place is (1) there is proof that alternate bulbs save consumers money, (2) there is proof that alternate bulbs significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions and (3) that it's shown that alternate bulbs "would not lead to a health risk for consumers, particularly those in hospitals, schools, day care centers and nursing homes."

FAIL

[MrB]

Though no curly fry bulbs could meet those criteria,

she should have stuck to the point -

the federal gov’t has no authority to tell us what light bulbs to buy. Period.