An open letter to Huckabee (About the Obama's birth certificate)

Anyone who brings up the ‘birth issue’ is playing right into the hands of this carefully planned scheme.

******

Which Obama camp scheme are you talking about, because it seems that many schemes have come from the Obama camp over the years.

As I see it, the Obama camp wants to distract us from what I consider a key issue: Did Obama's stepfather Soetoro legally adopt Obama? Enduring minds want to know.

NOTE: As we know, Obama is a big sports fan and he was a very good athlete as a youngster.

So why didn't Obama play Little League? Was it because he would have had to provide a long form birth certificate? Was it because his mother didn't want anyone to see it because Obama was adopted by Soetoro, or because Obama was not born in the United States?

Yes, the Obama camp may have planned an excellent birth certificate scheme to distract us from economic real issues, but the most secretive, successful evil scheme in modern history was the Japanese Empire's attack on Pearl Harbor in Hawaii in 1941, and look what happened to the centuries-old Japanese Empire because of that horrific scheme.

There is not one media idiot that will say the Odumbo is a Natural Born Citizen. They sure questioned John McCain’s ‘born’ status but not Odumbo’s. You are right saying that on many occasions Odumbo has said that his father was a kenyen. The idiot Bill O’ from Fauxnews will not ask about that. One time I would just like somebody to ask Odumbo if his father was a citizen of the U.S. and then follow it up with Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, what our founders meant by the Natural Born Citizen clause of Article 2, section 1. His alledged father, I know, was not a Citizen.

“The ensuing rioting in the streets across our country will be the beginning of the end of our Republic”

Or a good colonic, with the chance to rid the Republic of the traitors and enemies that live among us.

We have spoken to our kin in military positions, they understand which direction they will need to point their weapons.

I suggest you do the same...

Never fear the advance of freedom, but fight to the death attempts to enslave you.

We need not fire the first shot, but if they do....bring it on.

The Big Boo

Your comments as to rioting in the streets is disturbing. We should all just shut up in case some fools take to rioting?

I’d say America needs a refresher on its history. In 1776 there were 56 men who were willing to risk their “lives, .. wealth and sacred honor” to commit the treasonous act of simply signing their names on a document addressed to an autocratic ruler, and also to confront the then most powerful military in the world.

In the ensuing war, most of them DID lose their fortunes, many lost their lives or family members’ lives, but none ever lost his sacred honor. Today we are hard pressed to find 56 public men who have ‘sacred honor’ to sacrifice. Nor do we have any Thomas Paines or Patrick Henrys.

We’ve become an ill-educated nation with no backbone if we are intimidated by street mobs. If that is the case, all that sacrifice, and the sacrifice for generations since is for naught.

[We’ve become an ill-educated nation with no backbone if we are intimidated by street mobs...]

I absolutely agree with your statement that we have become an ill-educated nation but I think we still have the backbone to fight for our Republic.

But, I believe, since the installation of this current regime, they would welcome street riots, in fact, they may be just counting on it. It has gathered an army of professional protesters who do not fear spilling blood in the streets to achieve their goal.

My question to you is, what action do you think this president could take once the rioting starts and blood is running in the streets?

I don’t believe that raising the eligibility question should be held in abeyance because the nation elected a community organizer with thuggish friends.

IF the SCOTUS were to accept one of the eligibility challenges, and IF they interpreted the “Natural Born citizen” language in a way to exclude that community organizer, the process would be slow, affording the public time to look at the question and its significance, and to anticipate the possibility of the unseating. In that case, I believe public opinion more than any court would force a resignation rather than any legal proceedings. I don’t believe the reaction would be quite so severe as you envision.

I’ve lived through two related events: The SCOTUS ruled that Nixon had to reveal his previously secret tapes to the Congressional committee investigating Watergate. Their ruling didn’t force him from office, but by forcing him to put out publicly those tapes, it greased the skids for a change in public opinion, and Congressional Republicans persuaded him to resign.

The other event was the riots in DC following the MLK assassination. It was horrible. But, it ended. And the rebuilding took place. The country moved on. The burned out corridor of 1968 is a ‘hip’ place today. Unfortunately, nothing was done to change the mob mentality. So they and their spiritual heirs are still with us. There could possibly be a reprise. We’d survive it.

The Framers set out a brilliant plan of government to survive damned near anything except apathy. The test, as Franklin said, is “if we can keep it.” What we can’t survive is undermining our Constitution and the rule of law, regardless of who does it, and regardless of how mobs might take to the Constitution being enforced.

Some would incite violence by insisting this was done only because the community organizer is (half)black. Forget that any such ruling would affect anyone whose French or Italian bio-father was in the US briefly on a student visa and knocked up (as it were) a young American girl. And forget that this community organizer has nothing in his background remotely similar to 99% of African Americans. His family has no slavery history; both parents were Ph.D.’s; he went to the best schools; he was raised as a middle class kid, no different from many others of all races who lived in HI at the time. Cooler heads would ultimately prevail.

IMO, the street mobs scenario is be far more likely with a continuing downward spiral of the economy than unseating the community organizer, if it came to that.

[I don’t believe that raising the eligibility question should be held in abeyance because the nation elected a community organizer with thuggish friends.]

Actually, I don’t think it should be held in abeyance either. Several states have already started to institute laws concerning this issue. IMO, this is a good idea.

[What we can’t survive is undermining our Constitution and the rule of law, regardless of who does it, and regardless of how mobs might take to the Constitution being enforced.]

Looking at who is currently holding the top job of law enforcement in our country, the rule of law has been set aside in deference to their cause.

The coming months leading up to 2012 election are going to very telling whether we are going to maintain our Republic or not.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.