1 posted on
03/05/2011 11:30:38 AM PST by
george76
To: Carry_Okie; qaz123; Flycatcher; jazusamo; proud_yank; NVDave; MileHi; LucyT; Troublemaker; ...
Do states, or anyone, have the right to set limits on the spread of ESA-listed dangerous predators, including their impacts on not just other wildlife, but society?
2 posted on
03/05/2011 11:35:29 AM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
The governor of Idaho has ordered all agencies of the state to ignore any wolf related shootings. No money is to be spent protecting wolves and agencies such as Idaho Dept of Fish & Game are prohibited from cooperating with the feds. Where I live, wolves have been a part of the wildlife ecology continually since before man settled here. The Canadian wolves absolutely ignore the international border.
3 posted on
03/05/2011 11:36:55 AM PST by
oneolcop
(Lead, Follow or Get the Hell Out of the Way!)
To: george76
So what, and how, is Judge Molloy thinking? There, fixed it.
6 posted on
03/05/2011 12:02:28 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
To: sauropod
9 posted on
03/05/2011 12:25:02 PM PST by
sauropod
(The truth shall make you free but first it will make you miserable.)
To: george76; Howlin
Which reminds me, what ever happened to FReeper Howlin’?
To: george76
Right now, I’d say Muslims are a greater threat than wolves and we have less about them.
15 posted on
03/05/2011 8:35:24 PM PST by
ZULU
(No nation which ever attempted to tolerate Islam, escaped total Islamization.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson