Mr. Land certainly invented his own “traditional standard of proof”, eh? This is like a civil dispute between two parties, not a criminal trial. No party has a presumptive claim on truth.
Claimant. Not defendant. And it is not burden of proof, rather it is that the legitimacy of a claim to a title is disputed. The proofs each EQUAL side must be heard and weighed. See Quit Claims, or Quo Warranto. No such hearing has been granted.
This has been a mockery of law and process of law.