Replies

When Blackstone wrote on Common Law he wrote in the context of a King and subjects. The subject of a Quo Warranto -- the defendant -- has in essence harmed the King. That is not the same in America, the sovereign here is no King, it is instead "We the People of the United States". "We the People", as a people, and "We the People of the United States", that is as represented through our States.

A dispute as to whether a President is eligible to hold the Office is no trifle, and yet the COURTS have treated it as such. While process of law in the US has settled into many constraints, not all are wise, nor is process of law, Law, or is it Justice. Justice has not been had here, people are in states of uproar, that uproar will increase. Should a lawyer or judge love process more than Justice?

When Blackstone wrote on Common Law he wrote in the context of a King and subjects. The subject of a Quo Warranto — the defendant — has in essence harmed the King. That is not the same in America, the sovereign here is no King, it is instead “We the People of the United States”. “We the People”, as a people, and “We the People of the United States”, that is as represented through our States.
A dispute as to whether a President is eligible to hold the Office is no trifle, and yet the COURTS have treated it as such. While process of law in the US has settled into many constraints, not all are wise, nor is process of law, Law, or is it Justice. Justice has not been had here, people are in states of uproar, that uproar will increase. Should a lawyer or judge love process more than Justice?

Just because the Courts don’t decide cases the way you want them decided doesn’t mean that they aren’t taking the cases seriously.
There have now been 91 adjudications in Obama eligibility lawsuits and plaintiffs have prevailed in NONE of them. The lawsuits have ranged from small claims court in Florida to the state Supreme Court in Hawaii to 13 failed attempts at the Supreme Court of the United States.
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.”

If the “Obama is ineligible” movement wants Obama’s natural born citizen status examined in a formal legal procedure, find a prosecuting attorney to convene a grand jury investigation on this issue.

You can whine all you want about the legal system, every person who loses in Court says the exact same thing.
The fact remains that there are a score of well known, conservative constitutional law firms in the US who regularly argue the originalist-strict constructionist position before the Supreme Court of the United States on issues of concern to conservatives, from gun control to property rights to pro-life, and not one of them has gone anywhere near an Obama eligibility lawsuit.

I suggest that you actually READ Chief US District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth’s Memordandum Opinion in Taitz v Obama (Quo Warranto). Judge Lamberth is an appointee of Ronald Wilson Reagan and his opinion is extremely specific and thoughtful, particularly the section that addresses the requirements for filing quo warranto against a federal official under the DC Code.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30040084/TAITZ-v-OBAMA-QW-23-MEMORANDUM-OPINION-dcd-04502943496-23-0